always trusted wikileaks as being non-partisan until this election cycle lol. freaking sellouts

You liked them until you found out your team was being shit on, LOL.

So much for non-partisan.

wikileaks, much like myself, is in an eternal struggle against the establishment, the bigger threat here isn't some orange narcissist, it's an unhinged career criminal who runs their own mafia.

Don't like the establishment, then Trump is your guy, even if he's not the ideal it's the best choice right now, in terms of consistency this holds true for wikileaks.

If assange is still alive I'm sure he doesn't want to live in an embassy for rest of his life.

More importantly though, he is releasing some groundbreaking shit, a view behind the curtain into the inner workings of a rotten political organization, this is something you can respect even if you are with her.

This post was edited by j0ltk0la on Nov 1 2016 12:35am

Team? I don't believe you know who you're talking to lol

This post was edited by proccy on Nov 1 2016 12:35am

I feel pretty good about myself for recognizing that Wikileaks was run by a complete scumbag who can't be trusted long before this.

I have two competing ideas, some left leaning independent who believes he's the unbiased gold standard of reason and morality but lacks the self awareness to realize he's just a cookie cutter liberal like every other millennial fucktard in this generation or you're simply a faggot.

I'll go with the first guess but I still have my doubts.

Dang. Don't cut yourself on all that edginess brah

Who let killgore back in the building?

effecting the elections vs. electing Trump.

What specifically is the distinction in a 2 party system when leaks from only one candidate have been released? 90% of Trump's bad press doesn't come from "leaks" (other than the Billy bush tape), it's prerecorded footage of his own words lol, so offsetting the leaks for a "even playing field" seems like a silly argument.