At least it wasn't his daddy's money

Trump is probably worth less after his debt is removed. China essentially owns him, yet his supporters don't want to see his returns

USC/Los Angeles Times[1] September 9–15, 2016 41% 47% 6 2,497 ± 4.5%
Fox News[2] September 11–14, 2016 45% 46% 1 867 ± 3.0%
UPI/CVoter[3] September 8–14, 2016 47% 48% 1 1,265 ± 3.0%
USC/Los Angeles Times[4] September 8–14, 2016 41% 47% 6 2,499 ± 4.5%


trump take the lead, cant wait to see murica great again

If 60% of Republicans thought Obama was a muslim and Trump helped propagated the masked xenophobic racist delusion which inspired his "birther" conspiracy (which today he confirmed is completely false ) but never apologized for his actions or rhetoric- how in the world can anyone trust his opinion or not see that he is only trying to divide and conquer and not trying bring people together?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 16 2016 03:42pm

Trump is a deplorable toad, he and his deplorable buddies are hypocrites that seek to profit off people's ignorance.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 16 2016 03:49pm

there are those profit off convincing you and others the world is shaped like a cheeze-it, maybe direct that anger to its proper channel.

Like Hillary Clinton, who started the birther movement and put out pictures of Obama in muslim garb in an intentional effort to smear him as a foreign muslim kenyan, even though Obama ran a one sided clean campaign and implored her to do the same, which she flatly rejected.
The chief two birthers of 2008 are running against each other in 2016, you can't trust either of them.

do you mean this smear photo

I don't know why people keep referencing this, this is actually a rare example of when it's worse to have bad information than no information at all. For starters it's not a poll: it's a combination of a panel (which contacts the same respondents continuously) and a poll, but it combines the worst aspects of both and the best aspects of neither.

The worst part about it is that their original sample that they're now locked into (absent adding more respondents to it over time) is hilariously biased towards Trump: it has way too many Trump supporters, and for whatever reason they use a 1-100 scale of enthusiasm on top of that, which further skews the numbers towards Trump when votes don't actually count like that in this country. It's really a massive failure in the undertaking of measuring public opinion, which is a real shame because I was under the impression it's conducted by some of the same people that managed the IBD tracking panel in 2012 (an actual panel), which was at least moderately successful.

To which hillary put out the response:


This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 16 2016 04:15pm