d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Flat Earth > Real Stars
Prev1787980818289Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 7 2016 03:49pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 7 2016 04:40pm)
I wanted to address something
the equation F = MA addresses acceleration at a single instance as in any given point in time.
and is the is the physics definition of acceleration
its easy to get confused , because the phrasing of the words - increases or decreases in speed
but as soon as we introduced time and vector into the equation we have momentum
and this is how you get the classic standard definition of acceleration

So if 0---------0, <--------the force difference between two points = standard acceleration
if its just a point <--------- classic physics definition.

The word has two meanings and some might think it only has one.


Also i cant find a single thread in this post of any of the Geocentric posts in the past that even attempts to debunk any Geocentric truth
just that anyone who challenges Helio faith is a stupid retard and must be a religious nut-job, so if anyone wants to rage about how i never answered one of your questions or mistakenly think they have some singular picture that proves something then one just needs to consider how all multiple proofs I have talked about for Geocentric earth are not addressed at all, even remotely.


You're entirely wrong on this. Again.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Nov 7 2016 03:53pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 7 2016 01:49pm)
You're entirely wrong on this. Again.


wrong about acceleration being defined as increases or decreases in speed as well
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 7 2016 03:55pm
Quote (majorblood @ Nov 7 2016 03:53pm)
wrong about acceleration being defined as increases or decreases in speed as well


Understanding the difference between a scalar and vector is hard.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Nov 7 2016 03:58pm
idk why anyone that believes flat earth would learn ball earth physics anyways.
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
Nov 7 2016 05:35pm
I was drinking through a straw the other day and randomly thought of this thread, and I started wondering how card would explain the physics of drinking through a straw. When we suck the air out, we create a vacuum inside the straw. Water should weigh more inside the straw because it's in a "lighter" container, so it should never go up the straw. Hence, drinking through a straw should be impossible.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 7 2016 06:05pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 7 2016 11:49am)
You're entirely wrong on this. Again.


Force = Mass X Acceleration
Force X time = momemtun

If you can point out where i'm wrong, you'd have a point
but the "you're wrong" is not an arguement - it barely qualifies as an opinion

Quote (russian @ Nov 7 2016 01:35pm)
I was drinking through a straw the other day and randomly thought of this thread, and I started wondering how card would explain the physics of drinking through a straw. When we suck the air out, we create a vacuum inside the straw. Water should weigh more inside the straw because it's in a "lighter" container, so it should never go up the straw. Hence, drinking through a straw should be impossible.


barometric pressure of the liquid vs the air - and basically your sucking air out of the straw and the liquid follows and the pressure to "level" returns when you break the seal on the straw
here's a slightly more complicated example



This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 7 2016 06:06pm
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 7 2016 06:06pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 7 2016 07:05pm)
Force = Mass X Acceleration
Force X time = momemtun

If you cant point out where i'm wrong, you'd have a point
but the "you're wrong" is not an enlargement - it barely qualifies as an opinion



barometric pressure of the liquid vs the air - and basically your sucking air out of the straw and the liquid follows and the pressure to "level" returns you break the seal on the straw
heres a slightly more complicated example

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjUqVFmRZ2U


Mass x velocity = momentum.
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Nov 7 2016 06:08pm
How did this thread get to 80 pages?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 7 2016 06:09pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 7 2016 02:06pm)
Mass x velocity = momentum.


Mass X (Acceleration X time[or "velocity"]) = momentum

so you are finally acknowledging that i am right - how adult of you.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 7 2016 06:12pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 7 2016 07:09pm)
Mass X (Acceleration X time[or "velocity"]) = momentum

so you are finally acknowledging that i am right - how adult of you.


No. Acceleration is NOT a part of the equation.

Mass X velocity, whereby velocity = speed and vector.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1787980818289Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll