d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev17879808182183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 22 2016 03:52pm
Quote (excellence @ Aug 22 2016 02:04pm)
lol'd
the democrat candidate is either a crook or an unreasonable extremely careless liar. pick.

https://i.imgflip.com/19753y.jpg
https://i.sli.mg/OGiy5O.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images_5/lochte-douglas-8-20-16-4.png


I appreciate the laugh. Amusingly you just helped prove my point for me. I don't have to pick between "crook" or "unreasonable extremely careless liar." If she was the latter, who "lied repeatedly" about "easily disprovable things," then this meme that's regurgitated by uninformed people wouldn't hinge entirely on breathlessly repeating the one lie and then trying to extend that to represent a 30-year career that consists of thousands of public statements. If a member of her family told Clinton she was named after someone who gained worldwide acclaim in the 1950s a few years before she was born, she's not a liar for repeating what she was told. She just happens to be wrong about. She obviously didn't contest the assertion that she was wrong, or try to stick to the version that was told to her, when she was challenged on it. The head-nodders always conveniently forget that important part.

And she's obviously not a crook since there's literally no evidence of that, either.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Aug 22 2016 03:55pm
Quote (Pollster @ Aug 22 2016 04:52pm)
I appreciate the laugh. Amusingly you just helped prove my point for me. I don't have to pick between "crook" or "unreasonable extremely careless liar." If she was the latter, who "lied repeatedly" about "easily disprovable things," then this meme that's regurgitated by uninformed people wouldn't hinge entirely on breathlessly repeating the one lie and then trying to extend that to represent a 30-year career that consists of thousands of public statements. If a member of her family told Clinton she was named after someone who gained worldwide acclaim in the 1950s a few years before she was born, she's not a liar for repeating what she was told. She just happens to be wrong about. She obviously didn't contest the assertion that she was wrong, or try to stick to the version that was told to her, when she was challenged on it. The head-nodders always conveniently forget that important part.

And she's obviously not a crook since there's literally no evidence of that, either.


That's not the stubborn blowhard a Trump supporter can get behind.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Aug 22 2016 03:58pm
Quote (Pollster @ Aug 22 2016 04:52pm)
I appreciate the laugh. Amusingly you just helped prove my point for me. I don't have to pick between "crook" or "unreasonable extremely careless liar." If she was the latter, who "lied repeatedly" about "easily disprovable things," then this meme that's regurgitated by uninformed people wouldn't hinge entirely on breathlessly repeating the one lie and then trying to extend that to represent a 30-year career that consists of thousands of public statements. If a member of her family told Clinton she was named after someone who gained worldwide acclaim in the 1950s a few years before she was born, she's not a liar for repeating what she was told. She just happens to be wrong about. She obviously didn't contest the assertion that she was wrong, or try to stick to the version that was told to her, when she was challenged on it. The head-nodders always conveniently forget that important part.

And she's obviously not a crook since there's literally no evidence of that, either.


Sniper fire.
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 22 2016 04:01pm
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 22 2016 02:55pm)
That's not the stubborn blowhard a Trump supporter can get behind.


Yeah, no shit, which is one of the things that is putting us in a pretty much impossible situation right now. For the "mandate" concern trolls Clinton will need to win the popular vote by 10% and 380 EVs, all while Trump will be encouraging his imbecilic supporters to riot in the streets and contest the results.

Clinton is a uniquely-poor fit to be the person who will flick Trump into the ash heap of history, because too many voters have this impression of her that's based entirely on fantasy.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Aug 22 2016 04:01pm
Quote (Pollster @ 22 Aug 2016 17:52)
I appreciate the laugh. Amusingly you just helped prove my point for me. I don't have to pick between "crook" or "unreasonable extremely careless liar." If she was the latter, who "lied repeatedly" about "easily disprovable things," then this meme that's regurgitated by uninformed people wouldn't hinge entirely on breathlessly repeating the one lie and then trying to extend that to represent a 30-year career that consists of thousands of public statements. If a member of her family told Clinton she was named after someone who gained worldwide acclaim in the 1950s a few years before she was born, she's not a liar for repeating what she was told. She just happens to be wrong about. She obviously didn't contest the assertion that she was wrong, or try to stick to the version that was told to her, when she was challenged on it. The head-nodders always conveniently forget that important part.

And she's obviously not a crook since there's literally no evidence of that, either.

hahahha and which one lie is that - sniper fire we were dead broke or only one device or i turned over all emails or colin powell made me do a private server.

nice rage paragraph filled with nothing! good job!!!

speaking of colin powell pretty sad the racist democrat candidate throws the black man under the bus to justify her extremely careless and unreasonable decision making.



This post was edited by excellence on Aug 22 2016 04:03pm
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 22 2016 04:02pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Aug 22 2016 04:58pm)
Sniper fire.


ya she's a known liar...look at what her husband did under oath trying to stay the President.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Aug 22 2016 04:12pm
speaking of hillary's "i turned over all emails" statement lie :lol:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/22/the-fbi-found-15000-emails-hillary-clinton-didnt-turn-over-uh-oh/

This post was edited by excellence on Aug 22 2016 04:12pm
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 22 2016 04:15pm
Quote (excellence @ Aug 22 2016 05:12pm)


No way ! Hope she gets what she has coming to her for being such a shitty person her whole life
Member
Posts: 38,317
Joined: Jul 12 2006
Gold: 20.31
Aug 22 2016 04:19pm
Quote (excellence @ Aug 22 2016 03:01pm)
hahahha and which one lie is that - sniper fire we were dead broke or only one device or i turned over all emails or colin powell made me do a private server.

nice rage paragraph filled with nothing! good job!!!

speaking of colin powell pretty sad the racist democrat candidate throws the black man under the bus to justify her extremely careless and unreasonable decision making.

https://i.sli.mg/5jpsJ4.png


Stop embarrassing the shit out of yourself, unless you're just doing that for my benefit.

I don't see a particular reason to accept the right-wing bubbleverse's mischaracterization of her "dead broke" remarks, just because there happen to be other people out there who are uninformed. Anyone who has even passing familiarity with the political history of the late 1990s knows that the Clintons left the White House with more liabilities than assets on account of Bill's legal bills (that were incurred from having to swat away frivolous lawsuits lobbed at them by conservatives). They had more debt than money; that's what she was referring to. Her comment as a factual matter was correct; what's crazy is that they probably wouldn't have been able to purchase the Chappaqua home had they not done so earlier in 1999.

Her people thought they turned over all her work-related emails; they used a keyword-header search to separate the correspondence into the two directories and then handed over the entire business directory. Even the correspondence that turned out to be of a business nature, that incorrectly went into the personal directory, will eventually make it to the State Department (and public release). Clinton's the only Secretary in American history who will have undergone this level of scrutiny and there's still yet no rationale for why that is: every claim leveled against her has been refuted. They weren't lying when they engaged in that protocol, and this is the same exact protocol that every office uses when an official leaves. People give away the game on how ignorant they are when they howl over "33k deleted emails!!!!11one"
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Aug 22 2016 04:28pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17879808182183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll