no one claimed there was a "federal CIA" - i mocked your "international feds" term because it demonstrates you don't know what "federal" even means. your silly creation is a direct contradiction, it simply doesn't make sense. i know you're gonna try to weasel yourself out of this again, you already tried, but your posts are here for everyone to see - and they are hilariously dumb, sorry.

CIA and FBI are meaningfully different the way police and the military are. it's absurd to claim otherwise.

Omg, are you for real.

"International feds" does not mean they are truly an international entity. I know they aren't. I use this term to mean that they operate on the international stage, which they do.

You need to stop doing drugs.


Look, I can't convince you that their differences aren't meaningful, so let's just drop this, ok? I dont want to have to hear from you about this for 30 more posts.

Do you have some examples of actual things he tried to do but couldn't? (except overruling the election xD)

This post was edited by FantasyWorldII on Aug 11 2022 08:51pm

But friend, you are ignoring facts... You state that there are no meaningful differences but there are! I agree to drop the discussion because you simply ignore the differences.

that's not what you initially said though, you suggested that the president had no power when it comes to america's nuclear arsenal, when in reality he is by far the most powerful person in that regard, quite literally the only one who can authorise a strike.

of course one would hope that military and political advisors have a certain amount of influence on his decision-making, that someone as unhinged, short-tempered, and mentally immature and slow as trump would not be able to make such a decision without more rational and intelligent people advising him, but at the end of the day, it's the president's call to make, that's what i'm saying. so trying to defend trump by saying the president doesn't have the power / access to mishandle classified nuclear documents simply doesn't make any sense, yet that's what you did.

Nah. I don't ignore anything. I simply have a different opinion than you do. You think the differences are meaningful, but I don't. End of story.

Having the ability to launch a nuclear war does not necessarily make the Potus the most powerful person in the world.

I still stand by that, there's no president I think will get the final say when it comes to nuclear in 2022

If you says so but it's like saying there is no difference between police and the army.

Try calling the army when you get robbed. You'll see the difference!

This post was edited by FantasyWorldII on Aug 11 2022 08:58pm

I never said there are no differences. I said the differences aren't meaningful.