d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Remember, Its Illegal To Possess These Emails
Prev17778798081127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 22 2020 03:05pm
Quote (thundercock @ 22 Oct 2020 16:46)
It's a waste based on our electoral system. I agree that voting 3rd party would work if you could guarantee some sort of representation in the legislature or something like that.

agreed. i vote 3rd party at a much higher frequency locally in hopes it picks up steam
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 22 2020 03:19pm
It's not at all dissimilar to the situation in Hong Kong, or to Erdogan's Turkey post coup.

Once back in power, I don't expect the powers that be to allow something like this to happen again. Holdovers from the previous regime will be purged for thought crime, the Senate and Courts will be packed, the intelligence services will be weaponized against the right, and the far left intellectual fashion of the day will become the official policy of the United States government.

Nothing will be done with respect to UBI, the deficit, tax policy, and the horde of other policy crises which afflict the country. But that's par for the course whichever party holds power.
Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Oct 22 2020 03:19pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 22 2020 04:01pm)
But that's how lefties will interpret the 2020 election if it indeed turns out to be a landslide: a mandate for a bold progressive agenda. And unlike Trump who got in based on anti-Hillary and anti-elite backlash, they will have the full support of the media and bureaucracy. If they get to a 53:47 Senate majority or something like that, they can nuke the filibuster, give DC statehood to bring their majority to 55:47, grant large-scale amnesty, pack the courts etc. pp.

I agree that the coming 4 years will probably be a lame duck-ish transition period if Democrats defeat Trump, but it's by a somewhat close margin and they dont win the Senate, or only a bare majority. But there is a real possibility for it to be a landslide thats opens the door for structural reforms which permanently shift the country significantly to the left.


Goom thinks that none of this partisan power grab stuff will come to pass because Biden will not go along with it. I disagree, for his entire career, Biden has always been an unideological opportunist who accomondates to the center of gravity of his party. And there is a real danger for Biden to die or step down, which would lead to president Harris - and I'm sure that she would be more than happy to pursue these policies.


I certainly agree with the danger of a Harris presidency. But think of it this way. Is there anyone in the lead of the democratic party who is more resistant to the wings and inclined to hold the center line even against that pull of gravity? I mean, Joe Biden is one of the old guard of Feinstein / Pelosi / Schumer / etc who have spent years suppressing the radicals, and even as they ride their wave passively this year, they've made an effort to crush the Bernie loyalties, bring them to heel at the DNC and resist their platform. Joe Biden has campaigned on how he beat the fringes.

I think those same prognostications about the liberal fringes controlling the nominee could have been made about anyone this race. It is less true of Joe Biden than it would be for Harris, Booker, Bernie, Warren, Bloomberg, Buttigieg, Steyer, etc etc etc
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 22 2020 03:20pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 22 2020 03:38pm)
Not okay that Biden did it, but that there's less outrage is expected because the magnitude is expected. Trump has basically kept all of his businesses afloat by directing foreign nationals to his hotels at inflated prices, he's kept more of his properties above water by making secret service rent out rooms, has given national security secrets to Russia, made arms deals with Saudi Arabia after some murky financial dealings and fired the IG that was looking into them, etc. etc.

Neither are good, one's clearly worse, like pretty much every issue between the two.

Yang Tulsi would have been a pretty great ticket.


If the worst is true of both im honestly not sure who is worse. Self dealing to ur own hotels vs literal bribery by America's number 1 enemy.

Anyways I don't buy any of the trump lowered the standards excuses. I wasn't raised like that.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 22 2020 03:22pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 22 Oct 2020 17:20)
If the worst is true of both im honestly not sure who is worse. Self dealing to ur own hotels vs literal bribery by America's number 1 enemy.

Anyways I don't buy any of the trump lowered the standards excuses. I wasn't raised like that.

yeah despite his faults and fuck-ups he definitely isnt to blame there. the new guy is to blame for a 50+ year trend created by swamp demons?? easy cop-out for the uninformed who ALWAYS vote for swamp demons
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 22 2020 03:24pm
Quote (excellence @ Oct 22 2020 04:22pm)
yeah despite his faults and fuck-ups he definitely isnt to blame there. the new guy is to blame for a 50+ year trend created by swamp demons?? easy cop-out for the uninformed who ALWAYS vote for swamp demons


Or the new guy is to blame for what Biden did 2 years before he took office?

Still fuck bernie lol
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 22 2020 03:25pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 22 2020 04:19pm)
It's not at all dissimilar to the situation in Hong Kong, or to Erdogan's Turkey post coup.

Once back in power, I don't expect the powers that be to allow something like this to happen again. Holdovers from the previous regime will be purged for thought crime, the Senate and Courts will be packed, the intelligence services will be weaponized against the right, and the far left intellectual fashion of the day will become the official policy of the United States government.

Nothing will be done with respect to UBI, the deficit, tax policy, and the horde of other policy crises which afflict the country. But that's par for the course whichever party holds power.


We can at least agree on this.
Member
Posts: 50,918
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Oct 22 2020 03:25pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 22 2020 04:20pm)
If the worst is true of both im honestly not sure who is worse. Self dealing to ur own hotels vs literal bribery by America's number 1 enemy.

Anyways I don't buy any of the trump lowered the standards excuses. I wasn't raised like that.


If the worst is true of Bidens, its the worst political scandal in US history, bar none. It makes Nixon look like stubbing your toe on a door compared to a decapitation.
I can't really think of anything at all equivalent. I'd be a whole lot happier if Joe's story was more like the tea pot dome- beholden to corrupt domestic interests. Heck, look at the accusations of XYZ or even Reagan colluding with Iran to release hostages
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 22 2020 03:30pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 22 Oct 2020 23:19)
I certainly agree with the danger of a Harris presidency. But think of it this way. Is there anyone in the lead of the democratic party who is more resistant to the wings and inclined to hold the center line even against that pull of gravity? I mean, Joe Biden is one of the old guard of Feinstein / Pelosi / Schumer / etc who have spent years suppressing the radicals, and even as they ride their wave passively this year, they've made an effort to crush the Bernie loyalties, bring them to heel at the DNC and resist their platform. Joe Biden has campaigned on how he beat the fringes.

I think those same prognostications about the liberal fringes controlling the nominee could have been made about anyone this race. It is less true of Joe Biden than it would be for Harris, Booker, Bernie, Warren, Bloomberg, Buttigieg, Steyer, etc etc etc


But that's the thing: Yes, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Feinstein and the other old guard Democrats will not go along with fully socialized healthcare, a universal jobs guarantee, spending $30 trillion on climate change or any other insane far-left policy. Even Harris wouldnt imho. But why should they be opposed to structural reforms which permanently shift the static of American politics in their favor?

Court packing might be an exception because Republicans could easily retaliate as soon as they regain power. But the other stuff is extremely dangerous for any conservative person. If the Democrats add 5-6 Democratic senators via granting DC, PR and Samoa statehood, the GOP will not have any obvious or easy answer to neutralize this power grab. Likewise with amnesty and/or a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens. Once this has been passed by Congress, it will be too late for the GOP to undo the damage when they are back in charge in 2024 or 2028. Those millions of additional votes for Democrats cannot be undone. And the extra Senators and D-leaning voters would help them mitigate their losses in the electoral backlash that would be guaranteed to follow.

Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 22 2020 03:39pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 22 2020 01:13pm)
Holy shit
https://twitter.com/MikeEmanuelFox/status/1319280974044131328

Tony Bobulinski has shared perhaps the most obviously damning bit of evidence yet, a text message from Hunter Biden / Bobulinksi's business partner in China, James Gilliar

https://i.imgur.com/TlFeFFx.png

So lets be clear: We have pretty damning evidence that Joe Biden was involved and taking bribe money directly from the Chinese Communist Party elite
We're talking full blown Manchurian Candidate here. Remember all that stuff about 'the president being compromised by leverage a foreign adversary holds over them with a scandal'?
Well, Joe Biden was taking millions in Chinese bribes. He was involved, he was taking a cut of Hunter Biden's share


It's really hard to follow this stuff... I see messages where it's totally unclear what is going on, followed by your commentary of buzzwords and drama.

What bribes? These messages are from 2017, so what's the angle?

I can very clearly explain to anyone what the damning allegations were in Russiagate. Can you explain to me, without the buzzwords and extreme characterizations, what is happening here as it pertains to China?

This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 22 2020 03:41pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17778798081127Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll