d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Mgtow 2021
Prev1757677787983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Sep 14 2021 08:55am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 14 2021 04:22pm)
I don't see anything exactly wrong with this on first glance. One of the most fundamental parts of a long-term relationship is having clear expectations and boundaries. This is a little weird, but it looks like she's trying hard to interact on his level to lay this out.

Does the contract say anything that is outrageous? Because if not this is probably a pretty healthy dynamic honestly lol.


the problems are

1. its designed to extract resources from the guy with bs like expecting "romantic gesture" every two weeks, putting restraints on him while demanding her "freedom"

2. she believes that she wants this, but in reality she will start to hate him for complying like a beta male pussy

and then she will go to a guy, who would laugh in her face when presented with such a contract

Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 14 2021 04:45pm)
red flags are red flags for a reason. many of them are up to perspective if that's your thing. but any man willing to sign off on this level with that small of an amount of commitment 2 weeks in is ignoring a massive set of red flags. the contract itself is a red flag lol. of course there's people that on the first date are up front about wanting to be treated daily like they're a horse, and if you're into the whole master sub thing that's a gold mine, but for almost everyone that's a red flag.


she has more red flags than a chinese parade

Quote (excellence @ Sep 14 2021 04:55pm)
:rofl: hope there isnt a provision for marriage after x amount of time


that wil come later

This post was edited by JohnnyMcCoy on Sep 14 2021 08:56am
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 14 2021 09:13am
Quote (Jupe @ Sep 14 2021 10:09am)
gonna try to hook up that saboi incel friend of mine with my single mother friend, wish him luck gamers
already told him she's got kids and he doesn't even care (this triggers the endlesssky)



The deal breaker for me is a violent ex with 50% custody. And the throwing a hot dog down a hallway.
Member
Posts: 57,049
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Sep 14 2021 09:22am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 14 2021 11:13am)
The deal breaker for me is a violent ex with 50% custody. And the throwing a hot dog down a hallway.


dont worry she got a csection
let me know when ur ready to meet some hotties in jersey ill hook u up with the warehouse girls
Member
Posts: 54,148
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 14 2021 09:50am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 14 Sep 2021 16:28)
This is just "I wouldn't like it, so it's inherently bad".

Not all relationship dynamics are the same, and traditional relationship dynamics are often not a good fit.


There is no "you can do X after 4 years." They can do this if they want. Unless there's an actual red flag, I don't see a reason to interpret this as anything other than her trying to meet on his level.

I'm not saying its impossible for this arrangement to work out for these two specific people, I'm just saying that it seems exceedingly unlikely.

And yes, a chick trying to formalize and set in stone every aspect of the relationship two weeks in, without giving the young love/couple dynamic any room to breath or grow organically, is indeed a huge red flag if you ask me.


To pick just one point which is substantively a bad idea: the commitment for romantic gestures every 2 weeks - if a girl expects that level of attention and the dude only does it because he's contractually forced to, the relationship is doomed anyway, contract or not. "Involuntary romantic gesture" is an oxymoron.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 14 2021 09:50am
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 21 2021 08:40pm
I don't always share bitchute links.

But when I do...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/e2DOJTOZ1pw/

Entertainment level 200%. Truth level 300%.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2021 12:32am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 14 2021 10:50am)
I'm not saying its impossible for this arrangement to work out for these two specific people, I'm just saying that it seems exceedingly unlikely.
And yes, a chick trying to formalize and set in stone every aspect of the relationship two weeks in, without giving the young love/couple dynamic any room to breath or grow organically, is indeed a huge red flag if you ask me.
To pick just one point which is substantively a bad idea: the commitment for romantic gestures every 2 weeks - if a girl expects that level of attention and the dude only does it because he's contractually forced to, the relationship is doomed anyway, contract or not. "Involuntary romantic gesture" is an oxymoron.


It's exceedingly unlikely that any particular relationship works out. That's not really an indictment of this one specifically.

"without giving the young love/couple dynamic any room to breath or grow organically" is just a rephrasing of "I wouldn't be comfortable with it, so I'm going to invent reasons why its wrong".

It's super cringe to quarterback other people's relationship. I know a few people who would have loved to have the expectations of the relationship spelled out early on. Some people do well with structure and prefer their life that way. Others don't.
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 22 2021 09:16am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 22 2021 02:32am)
It's exceedingly unlikely that any particular relationship works out. That's not really an indictment of this one specifically.

"without giving the young love/couple dynamic any room to breath or grow organically" is just a rephrasing of "I wouldn't be comfortable with it, so I'm going to invent reasons why its wrong".

It's super cringe to quarterback other people's relationship. I know a few people who would have loved to have the expectations of the relationship spelled out early on. Some people do well with structure and prefer their life that way. Others don't.


That's what traditional marriage is for.

Who initiates 80% of divorces?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2021 09:21am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 22 2021 10:16am)
That's what traditional marriage is for.

Who initiates 80% of divorces?


Traditional marriages aren't for everybody. It's pretty silly to think that the diversity of human culture and experience would lend itself to one type of relationship.
Member
Posts: 33,925
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 22 2021 09:40am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 22 2021 11:21am)
Traditional marriages aren't for everybody. It's pretty silly to think that the diversity of human culture and experience would lend itself to one type of relationship.


Its the only vehicle that can consistently raise functional children. Other arrangements are irrelevant within the path of human evolution and have systematically gone extinct.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2021 10:16am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 22 2021 10:40am)
Its the only vehicle that can consistently raise functional children. Other arrangements are irrelevant within the path of human evolution and have systematically gone extinct.


So the person who is screaming about women only wanting to bang chads is talking about evolution to support traditional family structure by saying all other arrangements have gone extinct.

but it seems like the traditional family is going extinct, becuase of the issues you yourself are screaming about.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1757677787983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll