Quote (xfrodobagginsx @ 2 Oct 2012 00:56)
No What you have said is a pure LIE. It's interesting that your source isn't the Bible. The Bible is the Authority on my Christian beliefs, not some writing from some person who wasn't an eyewitness and lived thousands of years later. Really? You believe them over the Eyewitnesses who wrote the Bible? I believe the eyewitnesses who were actually inspired by God to write His Word.
SIN:
264. amartanw hamartano, ham-ar-tan'-o
Search for 264 in KJV
perhaps from 1 (as a negative particle) and the base of 3313; properly, to miss the mark (and so not share in the prize), i.e. (figuratively) to err, especially (morally) to sin:--for your faults, offend, sin, trespass.
You can believe what you want, but I
know a translation of old writtings (The Bible) should not be taken litterally...
Science evolved enough to prove some things like physical resurrection are NOT physically possible. If you think it is, you are not rational.
About the definition of sin : what is the mark ?
The mark is the present moment...