Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 2 2021 03:12pm)
so now you're in a place where the only definition you use for what is and isnt news and what is and isnt entertainment news is what people have said in court.
and because CNN hasnt said in court they ARE news and ARE NOT entertainment news (but of course have said repeatedly that they are entertainment news NOT in court) we have to view them against their own word (because, again, theyve said out of court repeatedly that they are entertainment) as Schrodinger's News. hopefully one day the box will be opened and CNN will be forced to say under oath what they've said openly and publicly for years so we can finally know if they're telling the truth about not being credible news. we can only wait and hope i guess.
you know, if you werent such a stubborn person i wouldnt have had to walk you into this shockingly low IQ stance just so you can say something is true of CNN that CNN itself says isnt true about CNN.
you look like a petulant child, all to white knight for a cable news network that brags about getting ratings by making people from both sides argue on panels. and to be 100% honest i wasnt trying to trap you all along, but u walked into a pit without me even doing anything. and now you just look like a fool. for the last time because it feels like im punching too far down now, next time someone asks u about a credible news network in contrast for Fox just reply BBC or PBS newshour, as i hinted you should do hours ago.
so you of course take Kyle Rittenhouse's entire testimony as a perfect illustration of the facts? correct?
u just dont know when to stop looking silly.
All good examples.
Quote (Landmine @ Dec 2 2021 05:38pm)
Then use the word in a correct context.
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation
This post was edited by SorceressAndrea on Dec 2 2021 04:40pm