Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 2 2021 03:12pm)

so now you're in a place where the only definition you use for what is and isnt news and what is and isnt entertainment news is what people have said in court.

and because CNN hasnt said in court they ARE news and ARE NOT entertainment news (but of course have said repeatedly that they are entertainment news NOT in court) we have to view them against their own word (because, again, theyve said out of court repeatedly that they are entertainment) as Schrodinger's News. hopefully one day the box will be opened and CNN will be forced to say under oath what they've said openly and publicly for years so we can finally know if they're telling the truth about not being credible news. we can only wait and hope i guess.

you know, if you werent such a stubborn person i wouldnt have had to walk you into this shockingly low IQ stance just so you can say something is true of CNN that CNN itself says isnt true about CNN.

you look like a petulant child, all to white knight for a cable news network that brags about getting ratings by making people from both sides argue on panels. and to be 100% honest i wasnt trying to trap you all along, but u walked into a pit without me even doing anything. and now you just look like a fool. for the last time because it feels like im punching too far down now, next time someone asks u about a credible news network in contrast for Fox just reply BBC or PBS newshour, as i hinted you should do hours ago.



so you of course take Kyle Rittenhouse's entire testimony as a perfect illustration of the facts? correct?

u just dont know when to stop looking silly.

Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 2 2021 03:12pm)

so now you're in a place where the only definition you use for what is and isnt news and what is and isnt entertainment news is what people have said in court.

and because CNN hasnt said in court they ARE news and ARE NOT entertainment news (but of course have said repeatedly that they are entertainment news NOT in court) we have to view them against their own word (because, again, theyve said out of court repeatedly that they are entertainment) as Schrodinger's News. hopefully one day the box will be opened and CNN will be forced to say under oath what they've said openly and publicly for years so we can finally know if they're telling the truth about not being credible news. we can only wait and hope i guess.

you know, if you werent such a stubborn person i wouldnt have had to walk you into this shockingly low IQ stance just so you can say something is true of CNN that CNN itself says isnt true about CNN.

you look like a petulant child, all to white knight for a cable news network that brags about getting ratings by making people from both sides argue on panels. and to be 100% honest i wasnt trying to trap you all along, but u walked into a pit without me even doing anything. and now you just look like a fool. for the last time because it feels like im punching too far down now, next time someone asks u about a credible news network in contrast for Fox just reply BBC or PBS newshour, as i hinted you should do hours ago.



so you of course take Kyle Rittenhouse's entire testimony as a perfect illustration of the facts? correct?

u just dont know when to stop looking silly.

Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 01:12pm)

Wrong I am not saying it definitely happened.
I'm saying there is no evidence either way. sooo

Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 12:53pm)

You can't cite a lack of evidence as evidence

Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 03:34pm)

Lol, you sound so silly. Rittenhouse was in criminal court. Lmao, at this point your just trolling and deserve no more of my time. I'm not even sure the point you're trying to make because you keep going off on another subject. Fox is not the news not even a little bit. End of story. Now you can go off and say but he said this he said that. It's not even a little bit relevant.

Quote (IgoSoHard @ Dec 2 2021 03:41pm)

Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 2 2021 03:42pm)

Perjury is perjury. u dont do very well arguing against yourself, im frankly shocked. you bring up that fox said they arent news, i say CNN did the same, u say it was court that mattered, i bring up another court case, and u say no its not court that matters, its civil vs criminal court.

dont throw ur back out shifting the goal posts. anyways im legit out now, its pathetic how much im slumming speaking to you.



gottem. just wait tho, ull get a "its not relevant" response lol.

Quote (IgoSoHard @ Dec 2 2021 03:41pm)

Quote (IgoSoHard @ Dec 2 2021 03:41pm)

Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 03:46pm)

Your argument is fatally flawed CNN simply said they are not 100% news Fox said they are not news at all!

How do you not get it.

Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 2 2021 03:52pm)

i got it 10 posts ago when i explained to you why both people said both things and why even tho they both said similar but slightly different things that they're the same.

you do realize, of course, because only someone with a potato level iq wouldnt, that Fox News does in fact present facts on their shows based on recent events.

like when the car parade tragedy happened they did present the number of people dead, the time and place it happened in, etc. along with a biased commentary.

its why i asked you for a distinction early on, because only someone who is truly a stupid person would make the claim that a network that DOES post facts along with bias is 0% news, unless they have an equally stupid definition of what the news is.

i will give u credit tho, while your responses are mind numbingly simplistic in their misguided attempt to tell me things i knew 3 hours ago, they are also keeping me responding. so congratulations on being not just unintelligent in your stances, but so woefully so that it draws me in.

you could, of course, save some intellectual face by simply defining what "news" is. but that would cut against what ur claiming fox news is, because u realize even as simple minded as you may be that they do present facts along with commentary, it would be impossible to give commentary on breaking events without doing so.