You still haven't said what this "lie" was?

Literally the next sentence says it also does not exonerate him.

no need to be exonerated if you were not guilty in the first place

Wrong, I am not the one who made the claim so the burden of proof is not on me.

Also, just fyi I rock with the no absolution theory.

Fox was FORCED to admit in court they are entertainment, CNN said it voluntarily and openly. but u only want to acknowledge one because it serves your "point" you were convinced i didnt understand for about 5 replies running.

CNN started as an around the clock news network focused on presenting facts without bias, they voluntarily left that model to be more bias vs bias focused with panel shows to run up ratings and compete with fox. and it worked. they became the left's Fox and are now competitive instead of just airport TV fodder.

CNN is such an odd hill to die on lol, they fully admit they're entertainment news, but you're white knighting for them as if they aren't, and as if the fact they admitted doesnt count because its not in court. when there are plenty of legit news networks to present, i even gave them to you.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 2 2021 01:52pm

Thats not their legal stance so clearly you don't understand.

You seem to think one negates the other when it doesn't you can be entertainment and news, but fox said they are 0% news

so now you're in a place where the only definition you use for what is and isnt news and what is and isnt entertainment news is what people have said in court.

and because CNN hasnt said in court they ARE news and ARE NOT entertainment news (but of course have said repeatedly that they are entertainment news NOT in court) we have to view them against their own word (because, again, theyve said out of court repeatedly that they are entertainment) as Schrodinger's News. hopefully one day the box will be opened and CNN will be forced to say under oath what they've said openly and publicly for years so we can finally know if they're telling the truth about not being credible news. we can only wait and hope i guess.

you know, if you werent such a stubborn person i wouldnt have had to walk you into this shockingly low IQ stance just so you can say something is true of CNN that CNN itself says isnt true about CNN.

you look like a petulant child, all to white knight for a cable news network that brags about getting ratings by making people from both sides argue on panels. and to be 100% honest i wasnt trying to trap you all along, but u walked into a pit without me even doing anything. and now you just look like a fool. for the last time because it feels like im punching too far down now, next time someone asks u about a credible news network in contrast for Fox just reply BBC or PBS newshour, as i hinted you should do hours ago.



so you of course take Kyle Rittenhouse's entire testimony as a perfect illustration of the facts? correct?

u just dont know when to stop looking silly.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 2 2021 02:13pm