d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Joe Biden 2020 Thread
Prev17507517527537541037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 7,274
Joined: Oct 14 2008
Gold: 210.00
Dec 2 2021 12:59pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Dec 2 2021 01:55pm)
running investigation for "criminal conspiracy" and then finding 0 actual cases of "criminal conspiracy" = claim of criminal conspiracy between Trump+Russia DEBUNKED



sorry lmao


You do realize that doesn't debunk it lol. You're just a troll.

Your right it wasn't proven. It also was not disproven/debunked.


Member
Posts: 7,274
Joined: Oct 14 2008
Gold: 210.00
Dec 2 2021 01:00pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Dec 2 2021 01:58pm)
CNN got sued for lying by Nicholas Sandmann as was forced to pay settlement money instead of proving their good name

?


Thats not even close to what happened

This post was edited by SorceressAndrea on Dec 2 2021 01:00pm
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 2 2021 01:01pm
Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 08:59pm)
You do realize that doesn't debunk it lol. You're just a troll.

Your right it wasn't proven. It also was not disproven/debunked.


its the burden of the accuser to prove guilt, not the burden of the accused to prove innocence
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 2 2021 01:02pm
Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 09:00pm)
Thats not even close to what happened


LUL

ok honey



This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Dec 2 2021 01:02pm
Member
Posts: 7,274
Joined: Oct 14 2008
Gold: 210.00
Dec 2 2021 01:04pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Dec 2 2021 02:01pm)
its the burden of the accuser to prove guilt, not the burden of the accused to prove innocence


Yesss!! your so right and you're accusing at this moment. You are asserting that it definitely DID NOT happen.

SO now where's your proof?
Member
Posts: 7,274
Joined: Oct 14 2008
Gold: 210.00
Dec 2 2021 01:06pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Dec 2 2021 02:02pm)


But where does CNN admit to lying like Fox did? Ill wait.

Theres a huge difference and that difference is one was intentional/blatant
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Dec 2 2021 01:06pm
Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 11:56am)
see the problem with this is it can't be proven.
Fox was sued for what I'm talking about. aka proof



It was proven.


https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-leak-regret-236184
Member
Posts: 7,274
Joined: Oct 14 2008
Gold: 210.00
Dec 2 2021 01:07pm
Quote (Landmine @ Dec 2 2021 02:06pm)


He said she said aka hearsay aka not proof.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 2 2021 01:07pm
Quote (SorceressAndrea @ Dec 2 2021 09:04pm)
Yesss!! your so right and you're accusing at this moment. You are asserting that it definitely DID NOT happen.

SO now where's your proof?


This sounds like someone has been drinking.

My proof for "criminal conspiracy"not happening is ... an investigation searching for "criminal conspiracy" - that found 0 cases of said "criminal conspiracy"

Robert Mueller:
‘We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.’
Member
Posts: 7,274
Joined: Oct 14 2008
Gold: 210.00
Dec 2 2021 01:09pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Dec 2 2021 02:07pm)
This sounds like someone has been drinking.

My proof for "criminal conspiracy"not happening is ... an investigation searching for "criminal conspiracy" - that found 0 cases of said "criminal conspiracy"

Robert Mueller:
‘We focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.’


the absence of evidence cannot be used as evidence lol. Try again. You have to prove it did not happen. If you cannot prove it did not happen then the best you can say is, we don't know.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17507517527537541037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll