Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 4 2016 03:30am)
here you go again assuming shit, there's an actual difference between "not understanding limits" and not agreeing that paradoxical math can be successfully applied to actual nature and assuming space is an infinite vacuum when we dont even understand 96% of the nature of that space or even have any examples of how nature produces a vacuum. Basically your comparison is not even remotely related or even true true and i question your level of understanding even the basics, typical crap from a trump supporter, lacks the qualification to make a logical comparison, has a group thought bias, feels qualified to make weak connection to things he doesn't understand.
electromagnetism having infinite range is not contingent on space being a vacuum, that's not relevant to its potential range.
limits are not paradoxical math. You can't just disagree with math -- math is proven it's not an opinion.
not understanding a vast amount of nature does not mean it is smart to reject our best understanding of nature
whats with the irrelevant insults?
This post was edited by majorblood on Nov 4 2016 05:37am