d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Flat Earth > Real Stars
Prev1737475767789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Nov 4 2016 05:37am
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 4 2016 03:30am)
here you go again assuming shit, there's an actual difference between "not understanding limits" and not agreeing that paradoxical math can be successfully applied to actual nature and assuming space is an infinite vacuum when we dont even understand 96% of the nature of that space or even have any examples of how nature produces a vacuum. Basically your comparison is not even remotely related or even true true and i question your level of understanding even the basics, typical crap from a trump supporter, lacks the qualification to make a logical comparison, has a group thought bias, feels qualified to make weak connection to things he doesn't understand.


electromagnetism having infinite range is not contingent on space being a vacuum, that's not relevant to its potential range.
limits are not paradoxical math. You can't just disagree with math -- math is proven it's not an opinion.

not understanding a vast amount of nature does not mean it is smart to reject our best understanding of nature

whats with the irrelevant insults?

This post was edited by majorblood on Nov 4 2016 05:37am
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 4 2016 05:38am
Quote (Knaapie @ Nov 4 2016 01:32am)
space isn't a vacuum.. You know nothing Card_Sultan


google disagrees with you

"Outer space has very low density and pressure, and is the closest physical approximation of a perfect vacuum."
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 4 2016 05:41am
Quote (majorblood @ Nov 4 2016 01:37am)
electromagnetism having infinite range is not contingent on space being a vacuum, that's not relevant to its potential range.
limits are not paradoxical math. You can't just disagree with math -- math is proven it's not an opinion.

not understanding a vast amount of nature does not mean it is smart to reject our best understanding of nature

whats with the irrelevant insults?


I think you are in need of some serious education, when you get some we can continue this conversation.

For example you keep referring to the visible light spectrum as electromagnetism - like do you go out on a sunny day and say "What an electromagnetic day!

Did you just google something and are using that word thinking your smart?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 4 2016 05:44am
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Nov 4 2016 05:41am
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 4 2016 03:41am)
I think you are in need of some serious education, when you get some we can continue this conversation.


what should I educate myself in?
Member
Posts: 11,801
Joined: Nov 21 2008
Gold: 1,002.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 4 2016 05:42am
Quote (majorblood @ 4 Nov 2016 12:37)
electromagnetism having infinite range is not contingent on space being a vacuum, that's not relevant to its potential range.
limits are not paradoxical math

not understanding a vast amount of nature does not mean it is smart to reject our best understanding of nature

whats with the irrelevant insults?


The range of electromagnetism is infinite and infinity small when nearing and infinite distance from its source. We can even say that one infinite is more infinite than another.. Although I forgot how that works ;)

It's a troll to make ppl doubt knowledge.. --> Flat earth.
Member
Posts: 11,801
Joined: Nov 21 2008
Gold: 1,002.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 4 2016 05:43am
Quote (card_sultan @ 4 Nov 2016 12:38)
google disagrees with you

"Outer space has very low density and pressure, and is the closest physical approximation of a perfect vacuum."


closed to =/= a vacuum -> the absence of particals.

again, you know nothing Card_Sultan

This post was edited by Knaapie on Nov 4 2016 05:45am
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 4 2016 05:47am
Quote (majorblood @ Nov 4 2016 01:41am)
what should I educate myself in?


you could start by learning how the visible light spectrum is only like 1% of the Em spectrum and how waves lengths differ and refering to visible light as the entire em spectrum is just being dumb and vague.
Member
Posts: 54,736
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 1,463.83
Nov 4 2016 05:49am
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 4 2016 03:47am)
you could start by learning how the visible light spectrum is only like 1% of the Em spectrum and how waves lengths differ and refering to visible light as the entire em spectrum is just being dumb and vague.


I already know this. Visible light behaves the same way and has the infinite range as well as it is part of the electromagnetic spectrum

This post was edited by majorblood on Nov 4 2016 05:49am
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Nov 4 2016 05:50am
Quote (Knaapie @ Nov 4 2016 01:43am)
closed to =/= a vacuum -> the absence of particals.

again, you know nothing Card_Sultan


I never said it was a perfect vacuum, just that its generally reference to as a vacuum

even man made vacuums on earth aren't 100% perfect

why are you starting the day with the insults, not a morning person? Need coffee?
Member
Posts: 11,801
Joined: Nov 21 2008
Gold: 1,002.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 4 2016 05:52am
Quote (card_sultan @ 4 Nov 2016 12:50)
I never said it was a perfect vacuum, just that its generally reference to as a vacuum

even man made vacuums on earth aren't 100% perfect

why are you starting the day with the insults, not a morning person? Need coffee?


Coffee helps ^^ But I'm not insulting, just calling out the bullshit you sprout out. Your meter is off the scale today.

"even man made vacuums". lets divert the topic to what men can make ^^

This post was edited by Knaapie on Nov 4 2016 05:53am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1737475767789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll