https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/06/us/politics/barr-and-a-top-prosecutor-cast-a-wide-net-in-reviewing-the-russia-inquiry.html

I still leave room for the possibility that Barr has found evidence that justifies this... but it's more likely he's a typical Fox News viewer and buys into the propaganda. It's highly unusual for an AG to be this personally involved in a probe.

Says two people who literally have no fucking clue what it means and what it involves to work for the government and hold a security clearance.

God-fucking-DAMN you people are literally NPCs. I'm gonna get heat for this comment, but I no longer care lol. Hate the meme all you want, I think it's kinda boring, too, but it's so fucking true. You guys are such fucking NPCs whose only "knowledge" is based on what you read off twitter or CNN.

This post was edited by CarsV on Oct 6 2019 05:17pm

I agree, but why are you quoting that post?

Everything he there was true.

Apparently neither does Trump, since every week we get another story about how he is messing up with his security clearance. The part of this presidency I've found most disturbing was that very early in our best allies including Israel and Britain stopped giving us information because they knew it would get into the hands of our enemies because Trump can't keep a secret or keep off Twitter.

He said Washington Post was pure fiction after retweeting a Washington Post fact check that said Schiff lied. Lol.



Not an argument.

Lol.

You're telling me that was a real fact check? With how genuinely awful they are, I haven't read those things in years.

Do people forget who owns the WaPo? lol

I'll eat my words if Trump gets defeated in the next election. Man of my word. But man, lol, the willpower that Trump is this evil, racist, corrupt monster out to get people that some folk believe is almost fascinating. Especially when you probe people hard enough and they can't actually produce anything other than some baseless conjecture they heard from a news anchor (who totally doesn't have an axe to grind) or nameless hearsay from an anonymous whistle-blower (therefore it is from the word of God).

This post was edited by CarsV on Oct 6 2019 08:41pm

Actually I've already produced evidence and you backed the hell away into the "but it's not technically illegal" corner

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 6 2019 08:44pm

You didn't produce any evidence, only what someone else thinks is evidence lol. Again, it's not against the law to investigate US citizens for corruption involving foreign business affairs and it's not illegal to ask foreign governments to cooperate with said investigation, especially when there are mutually signed treaties that explicitly facilitate such actions. I don't know why this is so hard to understand. But, then again, there is the Democratic party. So, yeah lol.

This post was edited by CarsV on Oct 6 2019 08:57pm

So then you're fine with opening an impeachment investigation against Donald Trump since it's not against the law to investigate US citizens for corruption involving foreign business affairs