take the win

Trump is the first President we've known in our lifetimes that could get away with nominating a Fox News conspiracy judge

dude went with a typical qualified judge both times

this really isn't in the bad column of Trump

Go back a page or two, i posted a quote from CNBC saying trump would nominate judges to overturn roe v wade. Are you calling trump a liar? You can't have it both ways... also there's the fact that kavanaugh questioned whether in roe vs wade is settled law in a leaked email... that's pretty strong circumstancial evidence right there... also he went to a catholic HS i believe? I don't trust
religious people in general (just my bias, you'll probably laugh but i don't care).

It's pretty obvious that Trump is neither very religious himself nor cares too much about traditional christian family values or lives by them. He had to say he was pro-life and stuff like that on the campaign to solidify the support of this crucial segment of the republican coalition - people with a strong inclination to vote republican, but who werent too keen on Trump himself. Had he given them any reason to doubt his conservative stance, that he is pro-life like them, this might very well have been the straw that broke the camel's back and caused the evangelicals to abandon him after the access hollywood tape.

I would bet a lot of money that Trump isnt truly pro-life, or pro-choice. I'm sure he doesnt really care either way. Both his SCOTUS picks so far have been firm conservatives, but no ultra-conservative nutjobs.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 19 2018 02:58pm

Major dodge - as expected.

Give me a link. Give me a credible source. I respect your religious people are bad blah blah argument, but that isn't credible.

I need more, guy.

This post was edited by djman72 on Sep 19 2018 03:03pm

I agree, i don't think trump cares either way like you said. It's pence that cares and it's his base that voted him in that cares so he has to be "pro-life".

Trump isn't a credible source? Wow, fascinating coming from trump cultist.

I just gave you plenty of circumstantial evidence that you ignored, i'm glad i didn't try any harder because as i Said it's a waste of my time judging by your responses.

Acceptance and being ok with it aren't the same

I'm not a Trump Cultist and NO HE ISN'T A CREDIBLE SOURCE. Trump is an idiot. He's said about a million and one things that are blatantly not true.

I'm just calling out your bullshit and you don't know how to respond. Dodge, deflect, ask another question, REEEEE about Trump.

Do better.

Thanks, all i wanted to hear, but that wasn't my only piece of evidence. It looks like you're ignoring the leaked email from 2003 where he questioned if RvW was settled law and he stated that the SC can always overrule precedent, at the time he cited 3 SC judges that WOULD overturn it... (per TheHill.com).