Trump 2016 - Topic

Member

Posts: 53,637

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 25,763.33

Aug 22 2016 01:24pm

Quote (thesnipa @ Aug 22 2016 11:12am)

Trump won't get anything passed congress, isn't mentally fit to serve, and his economic plans don't make sense, and therefore isn't worthy of voting for.

Or would you like to argue that's not an argument?

You have not validated your premises.

thesnipa

Member

Posts: 91,094

Joined: Dec 31 2007

Gold: 2,504.69

#7152

Aug 22 2016 01:27pm

Quote (majorblood @ Aug 22 2016 01:24pm)

You have not validated your premises.

sure the economic plan would need a bit of justification, and the mentally unfit is subjective, but its fairly logical to assert that Trump will face an uncooperative congress should he win. Its also fair to assert that he'd face resistance from other govt agencies such as the CIA he recently spurned or the army he asserts he can convince to commit war crimes.

But if you want to try and make the argument that Trump will smooth over his bad reputation with some of his Art of the Deal tricks be my guest, i personally think his argument needs justification much less than that one given the number of public figures that have spoken out against Trump.

Thor123422

Member

Posts: 64,732

Joined: Oct 25 2006

Gold: 260.11

#7153

Aug 22 2016 01:27pm

Quote (majorblood @ Aug 22 2016 01:24pm)

You have not validated your premises.

People generally expect the other side to be informed when having a conversation. If you haven't been paying any attention until now such that you can't see where he's coming from, even if you disagree, you're not really worth engaging.

Pollster

Member

Posts: 38,317

Joined: Jul 12 2006

Gold: 20.31

#7154

Aug 22 2016 02:58pm

I can only imagine what I missed while this dumpster fire was raging for the last week.

Quote (stimpy6298 @ Aug 15 2016 04:17pm)

i can't believe jay has the balls to call trump a flip flopper and liar.....wtf? Who the fuck are you voting for the pope?

False equivalence bullshit isn't going to work here, especially with me. There's obviously no one comparable to Trump in the way he has indiscriminately picked and then changed positions on every single issue multiple times. Clinton's got the most fleshed-out policy platform in the history of modern campaigning (having started laying it out earlier than most) and she's stuck to it, while occasionally integrating some new proposals. Like in most areas there's simply no comparison between the two.

Quote (EndlessSky @ Aug 15 2016 05:23pm)

He flip flops several times within the same post. Its pretty entertaining.

Thanks for the fucking laugh on that one.

Quote (EndlessSky @ Aug 15 2016 06:07pm)

Her post-convention bump is shrinking across the board.

And on this one, too. No it isn't.

Plaquelord

Member

Posts: 49,872

Joined: Dec 23 2006

Gold: 0.00

#7155

Aug 22 2016 03:59pm

Quote (Pollster @ Aug 22 2016 03:58pm)

Care to explain the Clinton Cash Video? I just watched it for the first time and I was actually shocked. I knew she was up to no good but didn't realize it was that deep... really pathetic

Pollster

Member

Posts: 38,317

Joined: Jul 12 2006

Gold: 20.31

#7156

Aug 22 2016 04:39pm

Quote (stimpy6298 @ Aug 22 2016 02:59pm)

Care to explain the Clinton Cash Video? I just watched it for the first time and I was actually shocked. I knew she was up to no good but didn't realize it was that deep... really pathetic

Based on the name I imagine it's the video format of the discredited book. I can't give a more-descriptive summary than that though because based on what happened with the book, the author having to "edit" (redact) so much after he published it, no one takes a single thing written in it seriously so I'm obviously not going to watch it. The author (Peter Schweizer) had absolutely no credibility before and especially has none now after this.

This post was edited by Pollster on Aug 22 2016 04:40pm

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,637

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 25,763.33

#7157

Aug 22 2016 06:40pm

President Trump Live

Skinned

Member

Posts: 57,901

Joined: Dec 3 2008

Gold: 285.00

#7158

Aug 22 2016 07:29pm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3749919/The-racy-photos-troubling-questions-Donald-Trump-s-wife.html

Quote

Earlier this month, a Slovenian magazine, Suzy, published a front page story claiming Melania’s modelling agency in New York, run by New York entrepreneur, Paolo Zampolli, also operated as an escort agency for wealthy clients.

‘On the one hand they [the girls] pretended to be models, but they principally earned money as elite escorts,’ the magazine article claimed. ‘They even had two composite cards (presentation cards held by each model) — with two photos and basic information such as measurements, eye and hair colour, and agency details.

‘One composite card was for the modelling business, and the other one for the sex business, as it stated whether they prefer the older men and described their abilities in the bedroom.’

The article added: ‘What Melania’s [composite card] looked like only the people involved know, but it is no coincidence she got a rich husband.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3749919/The-racy-photos-troubling-questions-Donald-Trump-s-wife.html#ixzz4I7Avmxhx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Freakshow full steam ahead.

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,637

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 25,763.33

#7159

Aug 22 2016 07:32pm

Quote (Skinned @ Aug 22 2016 05:29pm)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3749919/The-racy-photos-troubling-questions-Donald-Trump-s-wife.html

Freakshow full steam ahead.

is this information important to you?

Skinned