Quick reminder. His last words were "gang violence". He was trying to pivot a conversation about school shootings into anti-black propaganda. Lmao. And we all know it was a white dude that shot him too because this is Utah of all places.
A disproportionate amount of public violence in the US is gang-related. If we want a truthful picture of the scope of kids who snap and go on to spree kill their classmates and teachers, we must not conflate it with targeted killings happening in relation to gang-on-gang warfare. Both situations can be subsumed under the category "school shootings", but are very different in their nature and their causes.
By the way, why do you consider a mention of the term "gang violence" to be "anti-black propaganda"?
In any case, you still just don't get it: no words or speech can justify a cold-blooded murder.
Plus, even if Kirk somehow "deserved it", such an attack still needed to be condemned because nothing good can possibly come out of such a drastic erosion of civility. If political disagreements are no longer settled by debates and elections, by a public competition to win over the hearts and minds of the people, if political outcomes are instead determined by who has the bigger goon squads, better snipers or larger ammo stockpiles, society is doomed.