d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Joe Biden 2020 Thread
Prev17047057067077081037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Oct 29 2021 12:58pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 29 2021 02:08am)
If you think this approach of taxing unrealized asset gains would stay limited to billionaires once it has been implemented and normalized, it is you who's living in a fantasy.


I'm pretty sure that Congress would never pass a law when it starts affecting THEM. Any Senator/Congressman who has more than a million dollars in stock would never let things get out of hand like that. Also, we already tax unrealized asset gains through property tax. In many states, they have someone appraise your home and your property tax bill adjusts accordingly. As I said before, I don't believe in taxing unrealized gains but this type of bad legislation doesn't scare me at all.

Quote (excellence @ Oct 29 2021 07:08am)

that wasn’t on the Trump/Pence ticket when they ran in 2016 or 2020. Nor did Trump say this ever

massive overhaul (see: increases) of the tax system to “fix” parameters such as ‘climate change’ and ‘stock unrealized gains inequality’ were on the (D) ticket. in fact other than ‘shutting down covid’ (failed) this was a primary goal of the (D) ticket. 81+ million people said they were fine with this as long as trump would not be the one doing the signing into law

we all know that any new tax with a ceiling can and will eventually have that ceiling lowered


Fine, bad example. My point is, NO ONE agrees with a party platform 100%. You just go with the best option you have. That doesn't mean you aren't partially responsible for said policy though because of your vote.

It also pisses me off when I see headlines about billionaires getting richer during the pandemic. Yea, I did too. It's called owning stock you Marxist fucks.


Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 29 2021 11:03am)
Of course its how its intended to work. Billionaires have basically written the tax code lol.

They keep loopholes like being able to take low interest loans against stock to effectively cash out tax free for a reason.


Do we even know how much revenue is at stake from finding a way to tax them for this method? I can't imagine it being very much. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't find a way to address a very clear loophole though.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 29 2021 01:05pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 29 2021 01:58pm)
Do we even know how much revenue is at stake from finding a way to tax them for this method? I can't imagine it being very much. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't find a way to address a very clear loophole though.


Not sure on this specific loophole, but blatantly illegal tax dodging from billionaires and their companies is something like a quarter to half the 2019 government deficit.

There's a lot of things we need to close.
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 29 2021 01:07pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 29 2021 01:58pm)
I'm pretty sure that Congress would never pass a law when it starts affecting THEM. Any Senator/Congressman who has more than a million dollars in stock would never let things get out of hand like that. Also, we already tax unrealized asset gains through property tax. In many states, they have someone appraise your home and your property tax bill adjusts accordingly. As I said before, I don't believe in taxing unrealized gains but this type of bad legislation doesn't scare me at all.



Fine, bad example. My point is, NO ONE agrees with a party platform 100%. You just go with the best option you have. That doesn't mean you aren't partially responsible for said policy though because of your vote.

It also pisses me off when I see headlines about billionaires getting richer during the pandemic. Yea, I did too. It's called owning stock you Marxist fucks.




Do we even know how much revenue is at stake from finding a way to tax them for this method? I can't imagine it being very much. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't find a way to address a very clear loophole though.


stock gains are great and all, and i too am bothered by people who claim Elon getting his net worth inflated by stock fanboys means he needs to get taxed insanely (as if they'll tax unrealized stock gains lmao), but amazon and basically any online ship to customer retailer got insanely rich during the pandemic. all while large corporations took a hammering in retail, not that i'll cry for walmart.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 29 2021 01:22pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 29 2021 02:03pm)
Of course its how its intended to work. Billionaires have basically written the tax code lol.

They keep loopholes like being able to take low interest loans against stock to effectively cash out tax free for a reason.


Regular people do this all of the time; it's called a reverse mortgage.

Borrowing against assets is normal behavior, not some nefarious loophole. Elon is not spending nearly enough (I would be shocked if it was >$10 mn) that he would have to dilute ownership in order to afford his lifestyle. It's just more convenient.

Where we should be spending our effort is eliminating unnecessary tax deductions that corporations use to reduce their liability to zero. Not increasing rates (at least not now), and not introducing radically new forms of taxation.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Oct 29 2021 01:30pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 29 2021 12:22pm)
Regular people do this all of the time; it's called a reverse mortgage.

Borrowing against assets is normal behavior, not some nefarious loophole. Elon is not spending nearly enough (I would be shocked if it was >$10 mn) that he would have to dilute ownership in order to afford his lifestyle. It's just more convenient.

Where we should be spending our effort is eliminating unnecessary tax deductions that corporations use to reduce their liability to zero. Not increasing rates (at least not now), and not introducing radically new forms of taxation.


Don't forget HELOC as well. Pretty much every family in CA used that since housing prices exploded during the 90s and early 2000s. Like I said to Thor, I'm not sure how much of a problem this is though. Does it piss people off...yea. But people on welfare who do drugs pisses people off too. That doesn't mean we need to create a policy that causes more problems than it solves though.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 29 2021 01:32pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 29 2021 02:30pm)
Don't forget HELOC as well. Pretty much every family in CA used that since housing prices exploded during the 90s and early 2000s. Like I said to Thor, I'm not sure how much of a problem this is though. Does it piss people off...yea. But people on welfare who do drugs pisses people off too. That doesn't mean we need to create a policy that causes more problems than it solves though.


I definitely think there are more lucritive problems to solve first. Just cracking down on tax cheats would erase a significant portion of the deficit on its own.
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 29 2021 01:32pm
Quote (thundercock @ Oct 29 2021 02:30pm)
Don't forget HELOC as well. Pretty much every family in CA used that since housing prices exploded during the 90s and early 2000s. Like I said to Thor, I'm not sure how much of a problem this is though. Does it piss people off...yea. But people on welfare who do drugs pisses people off too. That doesn't mean we need to create a policy that causes more problems than it solves though.


i suggest we make fentanyl even stronger and just let the problem work itself out.
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Oct 29 2021 01:35pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 29 2021 12:22pm)

Borrowing against assets is normal behavior, not some nefarious loophole.


But those assets have to be real. They can't be unrealized gains.

Actually, isn't this how Fanny Mae got into trouble? They were giving people loans based on the values of their homes, which had gone up, but weren't real gains because no real transactions had taken place.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 29 2021 01:45pm
Quote (thundercock @ 29 Oct 2021 14:58)
Fine, bad example. My point is, NO ONE agrees with a party platform 100%. You just go with the best option you have. That doesn't mean you aren't partially responsible for said policy though because of your vote.

It also pisses me off when I see headlines about billionaires getting richer during the pandemic. Yea, I did too. It's called owning stock you Marxist fucks.

the 81+ million who voted for the most popular president ever definitely do. it was worth it to defeat the orange man. and yes you are responsible. evidently every trump supporter was responsible for all the “bad” that happened and all of the good (like full employment and record job numbers until covid ravaged the west) was just lucky circumstance

bold: why does it piss you off when you voted for this rhetoric?

Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 29 2021 01:47pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 29 Oct 2021 15:32)
I definitely think there are more lucritive problems to solve first. Just cracking down on tax cheats would erase a significant portion of the deficit on its own.


it isnt “cheating” to borrow against assets. you dont even pay your debts back you pale pasty privileged lefty lol

Musk absolutely destroyed your nonsense rhetoric. bunch of fucking native pale people who dont produce anything of value wanting to tax the most successful African American ever into oblivion. you fucking racist scumbags
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev17047057067077081037Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll