Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 29 2021 02:08am)
If you think this approach of taxing unrealized asset gains would stay limited to billionaires once it has been implemented and normalized, it is you who's living in a fantasy.
I'm pretty sure that Congress would never pass a law when it starts affecting THEM. Any Senator/Congressman who has more than a million dollars in stock would never let things get out of hand like that. Also, we already tax unrealized asset gains through property tax. In many states, they have someone appraise your home and your property tax bill adjusts accordingly. As I said before, I don't believe in taxing unrealized gains but this type of bad legislation doesn't scare me at all.
Quote (excellence @ Oct 29 2021 07:08am)
that wasn’t on the Trump/Pence ticket when they ran in 2016 or 2020. Nor did Trump say this ever
massive overhaul (see: increases) of the tax system to “fix” parameters such as ‘climate change’ and ‘stock unrealized gains inequality’ were on the (D) ticket. in fact other than ‘shutting down covid’ (failed) this was a primary goal of the (D) ticket. 81+ million people said they were fine with this as long as trump would not be the one doing the signing into law
we all know that any new tax with a ceiling can and will eventually have that ceiling lowered
Fine, bad example. My point is, NO ONE agrees with a party platform 100%. You just go with the best option you have. That doesn't mean you aren't partially responsible for said policy though because of your vote.
It also pisses me off when I see headlines about billionaires getting richer during the pandemic. Yea, I did too. It's called owning stock you Marxist fucks.
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 29 2021 11:03am)
Of course its how its intended to work. Billionaires have basically written the tax code lol.
They keep loopholes like being able to take low interest loans against stock to effectively cash out tax free for a reason.
Do we even know how much revenue is at stake from finding a way to tax them for this method? I can't imagine it being very much. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't find a way to address a very clear loophole though.