Quote (ferdia @ Dec 14 2022 08:53pm)
tentatively agree. I think Russia is pretty much irrelevant right now noting Putin's Russia is looking like a lame duck. If there was a misconception that my post was inferring that MSM was creating this conflict I would argue that your post has simplified my initial position into words that everyone can understand (and thanks). My own view is that it looks like we are heading towards a confrontation, or rather worsening relations. whether that results in a shooting war between the two remains to be seen, but in my opinion it does look like China is the New Russia and that both countries will be at odds for the rest of my lifetime (i hope to live another half century and more ok).
Would agree and add that Russia remains relevant only because of its nuclear arsenal and hydrocarbon resources.
Without the nukes the Poles would probably have leveled Moscow already. That is obviously anecdotal but not unrealistic based on recent events.
Russia will become increasingly dependent on China. China will be burdened by that obligation. And conflicted in its dependence on the US and EU markets for its good.
I can foresee a world, perhaps into the next century, where there are emerging markets for China's products in Africa, South America and the Middle East.
Its also possible that other nations in Asia can affect China's competitiveness and monopoly on manufacturing.
Yes and no.
No in that militarily China is decades behind the US. Therefore it won't seek to engage when the current trend is already in their favor economically, if it in fact is.
They are not behind in all technology but in the time it takes to build up the level of hardware, the experience and the global military network of the US.
China is barely a regional military power* that actually has a global potential.
*proven by the non-conformity of Taiwan and current containment of China inside the first island chain.
Yes in that they are already engaged in an economic war.