Actually everyone agreed in court that they had been

How so

Joe Larue, an attorney for Maricopa County, said Honey misunderstood the different types of chain of custody documents and argued they did in fact exist.

Honey also testified that a Runbeck employee told her that employees could bring their families’ ballots directly to the facility to be counted, and the employee saw about 50 ballots brought in that way.

When pressed by Hobbs attorney Andy Gaona if Honey had any further evidence of other ballots being injected into the system, she said it wasn’t an “answerable question.”

Just lifted from court reporting from the case.

The issue is that the whole case has been brought based on trying to extrapolate exceptions to make them significant in terms of outcome. That is rarely if ever the case, and more importantly, all this jumping up and down with whistle in the wind type cases obscures any actual chance of meaningful debate about any real issues there may be / are.

From my understanding the allegations were that the documents did not exist.

waht i heard them say, and I am the one that has posted links is the "funny business" swung the vote to hobbsgoblins side.

now if i have to ill go back into the links and time stamp them. how bout it?

You just want to believe what you want to believe, you always do. You only ever seem to read stuff that reinforces what you want to believe, and then you shout “lefties bad”

Short version, sore loser presents flimsy claims with no evidence to back it up. Court dismisses said claims because they are at best without foundation and unproven, at worst completely frivolous and vexatious.

You shout about it because lefties bad

ok so you dont have chit. ...........

Lake loses suit over her defeat in Arizona governor’s race
https://www.aol.com/news/lake-loses-suit-over-her-194617712.html

excerpt, 1st paragraph
"PHOENIX (AP) — A judge has thrown out Republican Kari Lake’s challenge of her defeat in the Arizona governor’s race to Democrat Katie Hobbs, rejecting her claim that problems with ballot printers at some polling places on Election Day were the result of intentional misconduct."

have to prove the misconduct was intentional what a clown show




This post was edited by TiStuff on Dec 25 2022 10:22am

The far right lost, so the election must be rigged.

Good luck to the kraken in the desert Phoenix Valley.

Stop trying to sound smart and butthurt at the same time. You’re only managing one of them.

If you allege that someone intentionally did something, then it stands to reason that you have to prove it was intentional. Otherwise your allegation fails by definition

Lol. She claimed intent, then can't prove it.