d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Tulsi Gabbard Leaves The Woke Democrap Party
Prev167891015Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Oct 18 2022 07:23am
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/ex-democratic-rep-tulsi-gabbard-campaign-trump-backed-kari-lake-arizon-rcna52666

Quote
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is scheduled Tuesday to campaign for Kari Lake, the Republican nominee for governor of Arizona, just days after she announced she was leaving the Democratic Party.

Lake's campaign said Gabbard would introduce Lake at a GOP forum in Chandler.

Gabbard tweeted out a statement early Tuesday saying she looked forward to supporting Lake, who she said "isn’t afraid to call out the elite cabal of permanent Washington and the military industrial complex and their propagandists in the mainstream media."

“For too long, establishment leaders from both parties have sought to enrich themselves, play games, and build up their power while ignoring and even enabling the suffering of millions of hard-working Americans," she said. "Kari Lake is a leader who puts people first, fighting for border security, energy independence, public safety, and other policies that actually make life better and more affordable for the American people.

The dramatic swing to the right comes after Gabbard, a former House member from Hawaii who ran for president as a Democrat in the 2020 election cycle, posted a video statement saying she could no longer remain a member of a party “now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness.”


Wow. Tulsi is endorsing one of the craziest GOP candidates... an election-denying lunatic. Usually the anti-anti-Trumpists try to finesse their inevitable move to the Trump cult... Tulsi isn't bothering with that.

I think these people are completely motivated by spite. They weren't accepted by the elite/establishment because of some of their viewpoints(Tulsi was a nobody in the Democratic primary), and that resentment fuels everything they do now.

This post was edited by IceMage on Oct 18 2022 07:27am
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2022 07:58am
if the most rotten disinformation peddlers & debunked "RuSsIa coLLuSiOn" conspiracy theorists are in tears (see example above), Gabbard is right on target

thanks to Mark Zuckergberg's confession we know that FBI rigged the 2020 election by instructing US social media giants to BLACKLIST a FACTUAL story of Biden family corruption via selling access to the white house for personal gain

furthermore, a cabal of government agents was caught in their effort to rig the 2020 election & betray the oath to their country by running a disinformation campaign against a sitting United States president in order to steal his second presidential term:
(the left-wing fascist "Democrat" party is yet to persecute any for clear treason)



Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.

Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”

Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.

John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.

Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.

Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.

John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.

Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.

Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.

Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.

Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.

Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”

Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”

John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.

Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group:
Didn’t respond.

Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.

Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.

Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.

David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”

Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.

Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.

David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.

Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.

Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.

David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.

Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.

Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.

Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.

Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”

Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.

Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.

Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”

Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”

Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.

Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.

John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer: Declined to comment.

Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.

Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.

Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.

David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.

Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”

Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.

This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Oct 18 2022 08:05am
Member
Posts: 54,118
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 19 2022 10:30pm
Quote (IceMage @ 18 Oct 2022 15:23)

Cheney is endorsing her opponent Katie Hobbs:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-06/cheney-says-she-d-vote-for-democrat-in-arizona-governor-s-race


Quote
I think these people are completely motivated by spite. They weren't accepted by the elite/establishment because of some of their viewpoints(Tulsi was a nobody in the Democratic primary), and that resentment fuels everything they do now.

Hmmm.... wait a second:
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 12 Oct 2022 20:36)
It's been obvious for a long time that there is no political future for Tulsi in this Democratic party and she acted accordingly. Just like Cheney and Kinzinger were staunch Republicans for their entire career until they had their falling out with Trump and now happily act as useful idiots for Pelosi and actively endorse Democrats in various midterm races. Cheney is even set to pull off a vanity presidential run in 2024 which is actually just a grift and intended to raise her profile. If you can't see the analogy to Tulsi's 2020 run, I can't help you.

Ha!


There might be ethical differences between their policy positions and endorsements, but politically-speaking, Tulsi and Cheney are the exact mirror image of one another.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 19 2022 10:33pm
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Oct 19 2022 10:46pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 20 2022 12:30am)
Cheney is endorsing her opponent Katie Hobbs:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-06/cheney-says-she-d-vote-for-democrat-in-arizona-governor-s-race



Hmmm.... wait a second:

Ha!


There might be ethical differences between their policy positions and endorsements, but politically-speaking, Tulsi and Cheney are the exact mirror image of one another.


Being a moderate/center democrat/republican was never a problem until social media, people join up to attack someone that disagrees with their side
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 19 2022 10:58pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 19 2022 11:30pm)
Cheney is endorsing her opponent Katie Hobbs:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-06/cheney-says-she-d-vote-for-democrat-in-arizona-governor-s-race

Hmmm.... wait a second:

Ha!

There might be ethical differences between their policy positions and endorsements, but politically-speaking, Tulsi and Cheney are the exact mirror image of one another.


Cheney doesn't have a future because she decided to stand up against the election deniers. Tulsi is a chameleon who went from attacking Biden from the left on economics to calling basic infrastructure spending socialism on Fox News.

Again, not the same.
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Oct 19 2022 11:02pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 20 2022 12:58am)
Cheney doesn't have a future because she decided to stand up against the election deniers. Tulsi is a chameleon who went from attacking Biden from the left on economics to calling basic infrastructure spending socialism on Fox News.

Again, not the same.


where do you get this logic from?

The middle likes Tulsi
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 19 2022 11:06pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Oct 20 2022 12:02am)
where do you get this logic from?

The middle likes Tulsi


What the middle likes is irrelevant to this conversation
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Oct 19 2022 11:06pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 20 2022 01:06am)
What the middle likes is irrelevant to this conversation


it's very relevant, it's why she left the democrats
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 19 2022 11:07pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Oct 20 2022 12:06am)
it's very relevant, it's why she left the democrats


Only if you're gullible.

You can look at her record and see she's going with what she thinks will get her power. It's really that simple.
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Oct 19 2022 11:08pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 20 2022 01:07am)
Only if you're gullible.

You can look at her record and see she's going with what she thinks will get her power. It's really that simple.


you clearly don't like her, but it's not the majority
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev167891015Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll