Quote (fender @ Sep 8 2022 02:47pm)
wdym? if you actually got rid of them it's be a MASSIVE net gain. the brits don't want that, and that's their decision - but to claim that they are a financial benefit to the country is just absurd...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiE2DLqJB8Uas i stated before, the only way to calculate it as a net loss is to make a plan to strip them of nearly all of their lands. in that unrealistic potential plan sure, it can be done and for the good of England.
i'd love to see the crown stripped, jewels seized, lands taken, corgis thrown into a wood chipper, etc. But im speaking in realistic expectations, not pipedream fantasies. give it 20 years, maybe Charles loses all of the luster Liz had and things change in public opinion.
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Sep 8 2022 02:50pm)
The question of if it's possible can be answered very easily. The answer is yes. Their right to anything in the country is a fiction. It only exists because the citizens say it does. That's how all property works. The details are irrelevant
You can take it and use the money you save to make investments in tourism. Same as every other monarchy on earth that gets tourism.
here's how i interpret this conversation:
me- well its a net gain for England
you- is it tho
me-yes
you- well they can do something else then
me-sure
you-plus the queen doesnt actually own it
me-she does tho
you-well no one really owns anything
me-ok
you-and she controls the country
me-no she doesnt
you-control isnt even real unless we accept it
me-im lost
it started out as math and ended up in philosophical strawmans, im not pro monarchy and would love to torch them.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Sep 8 2022 01:54pm