d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Do You Feel Foolish?
Prev16789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 1,559
Joined: Nov 11 2021
Gold: 11.65
Feb 28 2022 12:25pm
Quote (MadMan87 @ 28 Feb 2022 08:29)
China has pretty much said it is unacceptable already I thought with them demanding both sides “Search for peace and stop fighting.).


If China actually said it was unacceptable then the war would be over. Telling ALL sides to find diplomatic solutions is a neutral position at most.
Member
Posts: 15,062
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 24.00
Feb 28 2022 09:39pm
Quote (Vastet @ Feb 28 2022 12:25pm)
If China actually said it was unacceptable then the war would be over. Telling ALL sides to find diplomatic solutions is a neutral position at most.



They started trying to do peace talks as soon as it was reported. First day resulted in nothing but they plan to talk again.
Member
Posts: 1,559
Joined: Nov 11 2021
Gold: 11.65
Feb 28 2022 09:43pm
Quote (MadMan87 @ 28 Feb 2022 22:39)
They started trying to do peace talks as soon as it was reported. First day resulted in nothing but they plan to talk again.


I hope the talks are successful, but Russia never stopped indicating their willingness to talk. China has nothing demonstrable to do with it.
Member
Posts: 27,150
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Feb 28 2022 09:46pm
Quote (MadMan87 @ 27 Feb 2022 16:27)
But see I respect that(not that you need the respect of an idiot on a forum). The world is a scary place and shit is becoming unpredictable at times.


<3
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Feb 28 2022 10:22pm
Quote (Vastet @ Feb 27 2022 04:49pm)
I predicted the annexation of Crimea and I predicted the war on Ukraine. But I'm unable to make predictions on what happens next. Shit is too messy now. Russia very much has a right to defend itself but we are now at a point where defence of Russia involves a lot more than just simple military pieces on the board. The inaction of China speaks volumes on how far China is willing to go.

If I was forced to make a prediction at gun point I would have to say that Russia will liberate Donbass and Lugansk, and keep Crimea. But it will not topple the government of Ukraine. And there's a non-zero chance the remainder of Ukraine will be fast-tracked into NATO, as well as Sweden and Finland. Overall Russia will be worse off than it was, but it will gain the security buffer it desires to have. Though the value of that buffer is questionable.

This largely depends on how willing the EU and NATO are to relieve sanctions if Russia satisfies itself with the above, as well as the China wildcard. If there is no willingness in the West to de-escalate, then Russia will likely take the entire country and install a puppet government. It really has nothing else to lose and while there isn't much to gain there is some gain to be had. Unless China tells them straight up that is unacceptable, but unless something drastic happens I don't think China will involve itself.


When a government is solidly in place, and has a security state that is operational, it's relatively easy to maintain control of a country in the face of civil discontent, at least as long as you're willing to crack down effectively on opposition.

It's much harder to maintain control over a hostile, occupied state, especially when you aren't willing to employ the sort of brutal tactics that have been proven to engineer compliance. Occupying a nation of ~30+ million people is not easy, as the United States learned in Iraq. Putin's armed forces are not nearly as competent as those of the United States, nor does he have nearly the wealth or resources. The only hope for Russia was that Ukrainian resistance would quickly crumble and the facade of Ukrainian nationalism would dissipate. It's looking increasingly unlikely that that's the case.
Member
Posts: 15,062
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 24.00
Feb 28 2022 10:41pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Feb 28 2022 10:22pm)
When a government is solidly in place, and has a security state that is operational, it's relatively easy to maintain control of a country in the face of civil discontent, at least as long as you're willing to crack down effectively on opposition.

It's much harder to maintain control over a hostile, occupied state, especially when you aren't willing to employ the sort of brutal tactics that have been proven to engineer compliance. Occupying a nation of ~30+ million people is not easy, as the United States learned in Iraq. Putin's armed forces are not nearly as competent as those of the United States, nor does he have nearly the wealth or resources. The only hope for Russia was that Ukrainian resistance would quickly crumble and the facade of Ukrainian nationalism would dissipate. It's looking increasingly unlikely that that's the case.



The US is an interesting case. A lot of claims on how bad the US loses conflicts but the US is actually pretty brutal on opposition during a conflict. The issue is the US is also dumb enough to help countries they fight against rebuild.

If they would just focus on smaller goals like Russia “says” they are gonna do(we’ll see)(ie kill the ruler and leave.) instead of trying to force ideologies on countries they fight over half of those “losses” would have been “wins”. Fighting a religious belief or government ideology is a lose/lose situation. Why stay in Afghanistan after Bin Laden was killed? Another asshole will just replace him. Why stay in Iraq after Husein? Another asshole will replace him.

They waste so much money trying to accomplish unrealistic goals instead of just setting small ones so they can say..

“See how we killed him? Hope you pick a better leader next time or we’ll be back to take him out too. Keep your beliefs. Keep your government. Just put someone that’s at least civil in charge.”

This post was edited by MadMan87 on Feb 28 2022 10:41pm
Member
Posts: 8,545
Joined: Oct 4 2021
Gold: 281.64
Mar 1 2022 12:42am
Quote (MadMan87 @ 26 Feb 2022 13:42)
Do any of you who said the Russian Invasion was paranoia or propaganda feel foolish yet? Or is there still narcissistic ego shielding you from admittance of naivety?


I feel foolish just by reading their posts :(
Member
Posts: 1,559
Joined: Nov 11 2021
Gold: 11.65
Mar 1 2022 10:58am
Quote (bogie160 @ 28 Feb 2022 23:22)
When a government is solidly in place, and has a security state that is operational, it's relatively easy to maintain control of a country in the face of civil discontent, at least as long as you're willing to crack down effectively on opposition.

It's much harder to maintain control over a hostile, occupied state, especially when you aren't willing to employ the sort of brutal tactics that have been proven to engineer compliance. Occupying a nation of ~30+ million people is not easy, as the United States learned in Iraq. Putin's armed forces are not nearly as competent as those of the United States, nor does he have nearly the wealth or resources. The only hope for Russia was that Ukrainian resistance would quickly crumble and the facade of Ukrainian nationalism would dissipate. It's looking increasingly unlikely that that's the case.


Nothing except Russia prevents Russia from changing tactics. There's no economic weapons remaining to prevent them doing that. China just reminded the world of Russian security concerns, putting China fairly solidly on Russia's side. Which would terrify me if I were Ukrainian. I'd be running for the border at this point.
Member
Posts: 25,139
Joined: Dec 20 2006
Gold: 82,014.68
Warn: 10%
Mar 2 2022 06:32pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 26 2022 05:29pm)
It was their JOB to say those things. Not because they believed them, but because they're complicit in the invasion.



still posting your crazy conspiracies huh?

Quote (MadMan87 @ Feb 26 2022 01:42pm)
Do any of you who said the Russian Invasion was paranoia or propaganda feel foolish yet? Or is there still narcissistic ego shielding you from admittance of naivety?



They're not smart enough to be narcissist however that term like all clinical nomenclature is a sham. You have doctors wearing more germ protection than the patients they treated 10 years ago for being germaphobes.
That whole paradigm is a cia ceutical drug money front. If you want to use a term ending all terms it's mass formation psychosis.

They're anima slaves, not narcies.

This post was edited by lodd222 on Mar 2 2022 06:33pm
Member
Posts: 15,062
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 24.00
Mar 3 2022 08:55am
Quote (Cascadian @ Mar 1 2022 12:42am)
I feel foolish just by reading their posts :(



I feel foolish about 50% of the time I log on to d2jsp lol.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll