When you post here trying to make a point to the people of JSP.. I would try to respond to things being said on JSP>
You drink pee?

you mean extrremely conservative?
One of the more notable things about this incident is how Rittenhouse maintained nearly perfect control of his gun and firing decisions, reevaluating his targets multiple times per second, shooting only the people attacking him, not shooting a guy who tried to attack but changed his mind and backed up, shooting a guy who tried to attack, pretended to change his mind, then tried to attack again, and not shooting anyone else who wasn't an immediate threat. 99.999% of people or probably rittenhouse himself in the same situation, the guy on the ground would be justified in shooting wildly and hitting innocent bystanders. And in a sane society, those deaths would be felony murders by the guys attacking the person on the ground who tried to defend himself. In the liberal world, the guy defending himself would be convicted of murder. So it was a very close case even when he had nearly perfect control, which basically says the right to defend yourself doesn't really exist, not if this is what it takes to barely scrape by

Sarcasm do you speak it..
Rittenhouse would probably be the perfect cop. Insted of shooting/hurting the innocent he would actually hit the real target.
Too bad America has so many problems with stupid cops/criminals.