Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 13 Dec 2021 09:49)
Cali basically subsidizes the shitty policies of red states. They pay more federal taxes than they receive so Alabama can have federal welfare.
And red states "subsidize" Cali and other blue states with human capital year after year...
Plus, we must keep in mind that Cali is carried HARD by Silicon Valley. The EVA of their agriculture in Central Valley or the entertainment industry centered in LA is not that big. Cali is in a strong economic position because they happened to be positioned well for the rise of the IT branch which picked up pace in the 1990s and turned the state into the global hub of the tech inudstry. Without the tremendous tax revenue from the Bay Area/Silicon Valley, Cali's vast big government policies wouldn't even come close to being sustainable.
It's similar to how Pennsylvania and Ohio were populous and prosperous in the 1890s through 1920s because they happened to sit on tons of coal, the fuel of the industry at the time. Or how Texas's wealth in the 1950s through 80s was not based on conservative policies but rather on them sitting on a ton of oil.
Likewise, if blue state policies were really the key to prosperity, states like Maine, Vermont or Michigan would be better off.
-------------
On a more general note: voting behavior in the West, and definitely in the U.S., is increasingly sorted along the "winners/losers of globalization"-divide. States don't do well/bad because they vote blue/red, respectively, it's primarily the other way round: places that are doing well vote liberal, for the continuation and intensification of the course of the past decades, while places that are suffering vote conservative; for a rollback of these policies and disruptive change, symbolized by things like Trump's 2016 platform or Brexit.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 13 2021 11:59am