d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Is Getting Convicted.
Prev167891014Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1235Replies: 139Track Topic
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
#71
Nov 4 2021 01:03pm
Quote (SBD @ Nov 4 2021 12:01pm)
You're from Canada its the same laws.

Thats why if people walk through your yard for 20 years and you never say anything there's no an easement for a path through your yard as a public walking trail.

This is why you see no trespassing signs and gates, you just have to prove you made an effort to communicate its private property but if you don't you're not legally allowed people to get off your lawn if its now a public walking path.

Same with skidoo trails, atv trails etc. That is why you see those no trespassing signs all through the woods in random places so the person can give evidence they made an honest effort and thus an easement is not formed.

Its the exact same with squatting and property here in Canada.

Ultimately a lot of people don't know and they end up fucked with footpaths through their yards in cities. I don't understand why its not taught in school.


I see..

This post was edited by JessiWan on Nov 4 2021 01:04pm
Member
Posts: 29,003
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
#72
Nov 4 2021 01:06pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Nov 4 2021 01:03pm)
I see..


Its the same with shared driveways that are actually on one persons land. Suddenly the person with the land sells their house to another person and that other person says he neighbour get your own driveway but that neighbour had been using that shared driveway for 20+ years. To bad so sad for the new owner they cant make him stop.

Its pretty critical when buying large plots of land to know what easements are in place because you inherit them.

Its been a long time since I took a property law course but if i recall the time it takes to form an easement is provincially governed here in Canada. Could be wrong and its federal.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 4 2021 01:08pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
#73
Nov 4 2021 01:08pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Nov 4 2021 11:55am)
Is this how things work in your country? Holy shit, I cannot believe it.

Imagine me going to the central park in New York and just "squat". Now the park belongs to me.


You can't claim the whole park but you can claim a reasonable area. People did this for DECADES which is why in Home Alone 2 they said don't go to the park.
Member
Posts: 29,003
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
#74
Nov 4 2021 01:11pm
I enjoy this topic because its hot right now in places like Victoria BC , Toronto and Vancouver.

Neighbours who have erected fences for 20+ years over your property line now have legal use of your land. That's a big deal when your tiny lot is worth 1M+. To lose a few feet of lot is a major cost. Good old encroachment.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 4 2021 01:11pm
Member
Posts: 36,659
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
#75
Nov 4 2021 01:11pm
Quote (thundercock @ Nov 4 2021 02:08pm)
You can't claim the whole park but you can claim a reasonable area. People did this for DECADES which is why in Home Alone 2 they said don't go to the park.


Guess he deserved to get beaten and paralyzed on public property
My bad.

Hey if it was their property lawfully.
I'm all for it.

This post was edited by lolkggz on Nov 4 2021 01:14pm
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
#76
Nov 4 2021 01:12pm
Quote (SBD @ Nov 4 2021 12:11pm)
I enjoy this topic because its hot right now in places like Victoria BC , Toronto and Vancouver.

Neighbours who have erected fences for 20+ years over your property line now have legal use of your land. That's a big deal when your tiny lot is worth 1M+. To lose a few feet of lot is a major cost. Good old encroachment.


Can I ask you where you live? And do you work in the legal field?
Member
Posts: 29,003
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
#77
Nov 4 2021 01:13pm
Quote (JessiWan @ Nov 4 2021 01:12pm)
Can I ask you where you live? And do you work in the legal field?


No but several university law courses were required as a prerequisite to entering the Chartered Accountant program back in time.

I live where I love. The Arctic.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 4 2021 01:13pm
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
#78
Nov 4 2021 01:15pm
Quote (SBD @ Nov 4 2021 12:13pm)
No but several university law courses were required as a prerequisite to entering the Chartered Accountant program back in time.

I live where I love. The Arctic.


Ah I see, so you are a chartered account. You must be very good with numbers. And you probably rich.
Member
Posts: 29,003
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
#79
Nov 4 2021 01:21pm
Well, were way off topic now. On topic I don't think anyone on the jury is going to buy Rosenbaum was "falling" and not lunging. That's a pretty hard sell point.

I also don't think you can call the two "synonymous terms".

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 4 2021 01:22pm
Member
Posts: 23,666
Joined: Jan 18 2010
Gold: 30,000.00
#80
Nov 4 2021 01:28pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 4 2021 09:58am)
watching the defense bungle this case and try and overly focus on how deadly of a weapon a skateboard is has been really strange.


I could easily kill a person with a skateboard.
Just saying.

Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Nov 4 2021 10:21am)
This kind of behavior is well documented. Police tend to make it easy for militia people to come in and enact violence on their behalf.

The thing that broke up CHAZ wasthe police allowing armed men in Proud Boy uniforms to come in and basically just shoot people. Then they used that as justification since "now they're shooting each other" to raid the whole thing.


This literally never happened.

Quote (lolkggz @ Nov 4 2021 10:24am)
I feel different I feel like the prosecution is proving the defenses case of self defense.
I feel like the defense is just letting it happen.


Yes literally evertyhing the prosecution ahs said so far is a blatant case for self defense, thank you!

They explained literally that the people there wanted to cause him harm and acted on it. What more to self defense is there?
Whether you agree if he had aright to have a gun there or not is a separate issue - the matter is - now that he was in that situation, was he genuinely fearful for his life and well being? The answer is clearly yes, with people attacking him and pointing firearms at him and yelling "KILL HIM" and "SHOOT HIM".

He likely will end up with some gun charges, but nothing related to the actual incident of the shooting (Which was entirely justified)

This post was edited by ChronFather420 on Nov 4 2021 01:35pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev167891014Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact