you have an extremely radical viewpoint, but we can throw snowflake in there too since you asked nicely

Ok it wasn't clear in the original post, but I just want to ask whether the jogger had entered into people's house/s illegally.

Also, I don't understand the need to point out the races of both the perps and the victim. It's almost like the OP is trying to inflame the readers: "look! Two white men killed a black man! Aren't you enraged?"

Arbitrary laws that the government puts in place to collect money are obviously not what I was talking about and honest person debating this would have understood that. I believe you did understand what I was saying and you only reduced it to the quoted comment because you have no other way to win against my argument

It doesn't matter one bit if he was actually on a crime spree or not. You don't get to track down and engage somebody off your hunch, and if you do and that person ends up dead you are responsible.

I see.

I thought the two guys were police officers, cause the OP used the word "patrol".

You got to "patrol" but didn't read a few words earlier when it said "former police officer"?

I only scanned the OP briefly. I missed it I think.

Also, if the old guy was a former police officer, then it makes more sense. Not saying he should have done what he did, but it's at least understandable.

Everything is about race to these people. There should be a name for that. Maybe something that ends in ism or ist or something

Did you really just say that you aren't allowed to stop someone who is on a crime spree?
This is why I say kill them all

They had no way of knowing he's on a crime spree. If you murder a random person and it turns out they were a rapist that doesn't mean you don't get in trouble for murdering a random person