No. I did not say modern Western nations are la-la land. I said NetflixAdaptationWidow's reality is la-la land, because he apparently thinks bodily autonomy should trump the right to life.



I am not for sharia-style laws. I am not a Christian either.

using pre-enlightened times to dismiss religion post-enlightened era, wow such nuance... but then again you went to wikipedia to look up something from middle school

And this is just admitting you don't know how language works

He also doesn't seem to know the historical context of the Crusades...



The Crusades were self defense after 200 years of Muslims invading Europe, burning down churches, and raping women and children.

Europe would be 100% Muslim if not for the Crusades.

Without Christianity you wouldn't have the scientific method, the germ theory of disease, or the steam engine.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Sep 6 2021 12:18pm

lefties warping history to defend and justify they're modern day pale pasty views that nobody wants to support, because they're completely wicked, who would've thought. like for example, america being found on slavery and not freedom, top kek

bUt I wOrK aNd ReAd In ScIeNcE

"July 11, 1924, Fish found eight-year-old Beatrice Kiel playing alone on her parents' farm on Staten Island, New York. He offered her money to come and help him look for rhubarb. She was about to leave the farm when her mother chased Fish away. Fish left but returned later to the Kiels' barn, where he tried to sleep but was discovered by Beatrice's father and forced to leave. Three days later, Fish killed Francis McDonnell, also on Staten Island. During 1924, the 54-year-old Fish, suffering from psychosis, felt that God was commanding him to torture and sexually mutilate children.[10]"

Saying they were religiously motivated that is all

either most western nations "think" that, effectively making them "la-la land" by your definition, or you simply don't quite understand what "right to life" means. either way, your backwards views might be "normal" for people like you, but fortunately most modern secular nations see that differently.

a more honest framing of the issue is that your morals should not trump a woman's bodily autonomy. you apparently think they do though...

The original question was whether it was right or wrong. You are moving the goalposts slightly.

Religion doesn't innately make people evil or violent is the point I want to express.

It is argued that without christianity holding back the power of the sciences for over 500 years, it implies we would be way farther ahead than we are now without it.

This post was edited by Crunkt on Sep 6 2021 12:22pm