Quote (Budgeting @ 12 Jun 2021 12:52)
you raise a good point,. i do agree, private citizens should not be targeted in such way - particularly their private communications.
however, DOJ concluded under jeff sessions that they were not leaking and were winding down their investigation.
bill barr, likely under the direction of trump, re-opened it for purely political reasons.
to completely discredit those timeline of events is disingenuous.
There were a large number of leaks, therefore a large number of potential reasons to reopen the investigation. The real question is whether confidential details of the investigation were leaked to the public, or unrelated findings were used to legally attack those under investigation. In both cases, based on the information we have today, the answer is no.
At this point, you're impugning motives to attempt to create a narrative where there's a victim. There's no victim. No actions were taken against the aforementioned members of Congress. Investigations into members of Congress, the Executive Branch, and even the Judiciary occur on a daily basis, at the Federal, State, and Local levels. This is nothing unusual. And once again, these are public servants who are answerable to the public for every act and word. Due almost entirely to the fact that they know classified information that would harm the public if it were to get out, the only people qualified to investigate them is the DOJ.
I'm glad that we can agree that comparing this to the 2016 investigation against Trump is nonsense though. And as far as "spying on citizens" this does not meet the necessary requirement, to me. To be a public servant means you must be held accountable for your actions. If you're above investigation, how can you be held to account?