Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 8 2021 04:45pm)
If they are truly that valuable, that all of society depends on them and them leaving results in anarchy, then maybe we should, as a society, reevaluate the pay and benefits for those workers so they don't want to strike.
Seems like exactly what we want unions to do. Strike, show everybody they're incredibly valuable, give it to the demands. If they aren't that valuable, then go a little bit without and replace them.
If your union is trying to get higher pay, and the state says no, and there's another union of teachers with spare capacity that can step in, then maybe kick your union leaders to the curb for losing you money.
The idea that teachers are criminally underpaid is a myth. id be happy to pay them more with more quality from their teaching.
keep in mind im married to a teacher, the benefits alone make the profession insanely well paid. i paid like 200$ for the entire birth of my child. and it was a c-section. that's 3 days stay, tongue tie fixing procedure, etc etc etc.
and even the base pay my wife makes is very good, and we live in rural bumfuck nowhere where pay is far lower than other places where the cost of living isn't much more. AND her district is non-union, so she only gets the fringe benefits of the state unions action.
teachers strike by exploiting this narrative, not because the narrative is reality. paying more in a vacuum wont improve education, and many teachers agree. they'd rather increased aides and better resources in lieu of increased pay. bad teachers tho, want that cash.