What level of whiteness are you, if you think mayonnaise is too spicy?

Check out the easily accessible information on the Zulu empire and there expansion wars, if you're not into history check examples of our modern time like the Rwanda genocide and what they did to the women you little weasel of a man.

You would most likely publicly state that those things didn't happen /fakenews or so shitty purple haired bullcrap.

Funny is that the african slave trade link I posted is very relevant to YOU because it describes how shitty EU migrant policies have resulted in a stream of migrants when they first opened the floodgates and then made a "deal" with Libyan warlords to stop those migrants, they are now trapped there and sold off as slaves https://time.com/longform/african-slave-trade/

my bad, i mistook you for the other racist rando, because you replied to the post i addressed to them. no offence, but you guys are basically indistinguishable for me, just looking at what you post, lol.

I replied to to your twisted logic, suck that up

The thing about German history is when the Romans invaded, they crushed the centralized government. They did not succeed in the full conquest of Germania though. After they were thrown out, nobody was strong enough to take leadership. So Germany spent the next ~2000 years as a tribal nation. He's not upset about comments regarding African tribal warfare. What pisses him off is the German tribes spent the better part of 2000 years doing the exact same thing.

Your shot hits too close to home. I think at first, he was getting really mad because he thought you were accusing Germans of being black.

Since when do i hate white people?

Since you started thinking all white people are bad because of slavery that happened in the past, ignoring black people did the same to their fellow blacks and ignoring the fact that western nations are nowadays helping those poor black countries in many ways, spending a % of their budget on that...

You get completely worked up over illegal migration, it's a simple fact western countries can't open the floodgates, see what happened in Africa, it's that link I posted a couple times now...

Oh you ignored that so it ain't happening in your mind, can't see that so it ain't real #fakenews hmm?

He was wrong on voter suppression, you're right. No, the parties did not flip platforms. If they did, what bullet points were they? Be specific. Precisely one Senator switched parties in that era: Strom Thurmond.





What level of white? That's a tough call. On one hand, I acknowledge that I and my ancestors benefit(ed) from some level of privilege, support the ideas behind BLM (but not the organization), support opening the floodgates for immigration, and enthusiastically believe black guns matter. On the other, all my ancestors were Swedish - as pasty as they come, believe people should have to identify themselves to vote (free IDs), oppose the notion of reparations, and as everyone here knows: Santara racist. So... 7ish?

says the biggest keyboard warrior probably in this forum

i said it before, triggered guys like you will get punched in the face in 5 minutes in real life

not at university of course, where you are studying sociology in the 20th semester while planning the world revolution with your pink haired friends

We can squabble all we want about the problem description, but that's not the point. What I wrote about the solution is still correct: trying to overcome racial inequality via counter-discrimination or even counter-racism is the wrong approach, it will only poison race relations and politics even further. Ban John from the race, but dont punish people 30 years later because their parents used to be on John's team. Talking about white privilege might play decently well with whites who are indeed privileged, so privileged they can spare some of it. But it's absolutely toxic to non-privileged whites, it causes them to flock to figures like Trump in droves.



Like I said: the Bernie 2016 approach of colorblind investment in all poor communities is the correct path forward - it will automatically reduce racial inequality without pitting races against each other. Move in against explicit discrimination, but do it in targetted fashion instead of 'guilt by association'.

Generally speaking: the main cleavage in American politics should be rich vs poor, not white vs non-white. It really baffles me that even high IQ people like you fail to see how modern identity politics are a deliberate (!!) distraction amped up by the billionaire class via their allies in politics, media, NGOs and academia. It's textbook "divide and conquer", why cant you guys see that?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 19 2021 05:33am