I literally replied to this with three actual generation sources that will be important in the future, wind was not one of them, and i am the dumbass?




This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jan 18 2021 06:19pm

Stupid Aussie can’t figure out with the loss of fossil fuels that nuclear will be under the same attacks as coal. That hydro is dependent on a reservoir and solar is a pipe dream that can’t predict blackouts to the grid.

The existing route makes way more sense, more pipeline in Canada, less in USA.

So you are an "engineer" and you are spouting off debunked myths about solar that have been untrue for roughly 5 years now?
Solar doesn't have to predict anything, you have a battery reserve that steps in to fill demand when supply dips, as to nuclear, i do not care about irrational debate on the subject when the safety is proven and the economic benefits are shown it will happen regardless of what wanda the essential oil seller has to say.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jan 18 2021 06:44pm

That’s not what I’m saying. There’s several grids in the USA. If hydro was to come off the grid and go to the island I’m not positive that solar would be capable to maintain draw off the grid with the loss of hydro and then you get into a whole other topic about battery cost, back up battery chargers and it alone being a hazardous waste.

All problems that are being worked on with great progress as we speak..