Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 15 2021 02:01pm)
Signatures are an entirely subjective measurement and is based entirely on the bias of the arbiters that run the process.
You realize you just admitted that the audit you are calling for is not a valid way to exclude people's ballots, right? If a signature is a subjective measurement entirely based on the arbiters (which isn't true since tons of precincts use a computer on the first pass) then it isn't a valid way to exclude ballots.
Man you just can't help but shoot yourself in the foot.
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 15 2021 02:03pm)
You dont need proof of fraud, just proof of an insecure system.
Widespread unsolicited mail in voting is unsecure by all scientific measures.
Fuck your mom
An insecure system alone does absolutely jack shit to change the results of the election. God you're dumb.
Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 15 2021 02:05pm)
no, thats not like at all how it works. proof of fraud overturns an election, proof of insecure system causes changes to the system, be it state or federal.
have u been living in a dreamland where u think just proving fraud could have happened somehow causes a re-vote or trump to retain?
oh man, i just feel sad now that i get why you're so hopeful. its like finding out a poor kid thinks santa is going to put something under the tree.
Oh already handled.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jan 15 2021 02:09pm