d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Climate Change
Prev16789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,750
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Warn: 50%
Sep 22 2020 03:14am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Sep 22 2020 08:10pm)
Okay, you brought up one great point that I'd like to hammer down on, if you have the patience, because I really am interested in your viewpoint. Again, to note first that I'm going to address it from a very Americanized point of view, I believe the bolded point is very important. First I have several questions regarding your flat statement:

1. What lifestyle demands a lot more resources at the expense of other nations? In my average day, I eat food that was grown in the US, drink and take care of hygiene tasks in water that was purified in the US using local sources, power my internet and fuel my vehicle with power produced in the US. Indeed, the US provides a massive amount of power resources, food, and fresh clean drinking water to many areas in Africa and the middle east. Who is the drain on what resources? I will need more information for that to make sense, simply because while I think I know what you're driving at, I'd rather not put words in your mouth.

2. What portion of living is unsustainable? We've already made it clear that at least in the western world, the majority of the basics such as food, shelter, and clean water, we can manage perfectly well in a completely sustainable way. Power requirements are great on current systems for 90 years minimum, extending out to 500+ years if coal comes back into favor or nuclear comes back into favor. Ideally, neither would be relied on, which is why we invest billions per year into alternative power sources. But for now, they're perfectly fine. So which part are you pointing at?

3. Again, with the (mostly useless) "what if" scenario, what if the western world stopped having children entirely. Who's going to take over the medical care, food, water, and other responsibilities we have largely taken on to make the third world's very lives sustainable?

I don't know that I disagree with the premise that there are some things that are very wrong. I'm merely not certain that pointing a finger in the direction of western society is going to fix anything, or whether it'll intensify the issues.


Well in summary of your point as I understand it western world (US) has it pretty good so far what would my suggestions improve/help/solve.

A lot of the products come from oversees usually due to cheap labor. Not to mention under the table sub living wages for illegals which provide comfortable lifestyle to many. While US is large enough to have most of its needs met on home soil, what about huge number of smaller nations which require Ore, fuel, timber to be mined, extracted from elsewhere and usually not in a sustainable way?

So in your assessment the US is not as bad its other countries which need to change is a bit simplistic. US dollar drives the economy, western culture paves the way for the rest of the world.
I mentioned earlier that you vote with your dollar, well demand for organics has increased. All kinds of shops popped up over the last 20 years, Now most major supermarkets around the world have and organics isle/section which was almost unheard of.

I also mentioned having less kids or none. I didn't mean this as an ultimatum from now to the rest of eternity. While this advice would probably benefit most to places like india/china it would give slow down or give buffer for our sustainabilty practices to catchup across the world. At some later point when we reach 20million or maybe 30 or whatever the number this world will be pushed to its full capacity. The planet will physically would not cope. At some point we have to say lets colonize another planet or reduce/maintain an equilibrium. The boomer generation where they agreed to multiply, maybe we can have a generation lets slow down and make do until we are ready to have more.
Member
Posts: 49,145
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 16.93
Sep 22 2020 05:10am
We have a battery here in south australia that keeps solar power stored while the sun is down, tesla built it for us.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 22 2020 05:15am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Sep 22 2020 01:10pm)
We have a battery here in south australia that keeps solar power stored while the sun is down, tesla built it for us.


There is plenty of elevation in the US for pumped energy storage too.

In reality there are tons of possibilities to address the need for renewable energy, all that is lacking is the political will.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Sep 22 2020 05:25am
Solar-to-hydrogen seems great
Member
Posts: 33,706
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,525.52
Sep 22 2020 05:46am
Quote (addone @ Sep 21 2020 06:15pm)
Real solutions:
Have less or no kids because it's taxing on the planets resources. Probably best thing you can do.
Plant native trees
Support sustainable companies and practices
Educate the young


No this is wrong

We need more kids. We just need less POOR kids

Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Sep 22 2020 07:25am)
Solar-to-hydrogen seems great



Biofuel and nuclear are the only two good long term options

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Sep 22 2020 05:53am
Member
Posts: 18,002
Joined: Jul 15 2014
Gold: 107.77
Sep 22 2020 07:03am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 22 2020 06:46am)
No this is wrong

We need more kids. We just need less POOR kids


Member
Posts: 9,750
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Warn: 50%
Sep 22 2020 09:05pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 22 2020 11:46pm)
No this is wrong

We need more kids. We just need less POOR kids




Biofuel and nuclear are the only two good long term options


LOL what are you taking?
Member
Posts: 33,706
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,525.52
Sep 22 2020 09:18pm
Quote (addone @ Sep 22 2020 11:05pm)
LOL what are you taking?


United States is barely having any kids. Ethiopiafags need to stop churning out poor babies
Member
Posts: 38,640
Joined: Apr 1 2007
Gold: 88.21
Sep 22 2020 09:21pm
Quote (addone @ Sep 22 2020 08:05pm)
LOL what are you taking?


"nuclear waste" is still like 97-98% pure uranium. the fact they call it "waste" is propaganda

an atomic physicist would call it "future fuel"
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Sep 23 2020 04:27am
Quote (proccy @ Sep 23 2020 05:21am)
"nuclear waste" is still like 97-98% pure uranium. the fact they call it "waste" is propaganda

an atomic physicist would call it "future fuel"


Breeder reactors have been tried, and they were wholly unsuccessfull. Of course we might get better tech in the future but I'd rather that funding go to fusion research.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev16789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll