Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 19 2020 11:05pm)
I pretty much agree, but Bernie was overall a negative, he stumbled hard on the Bernie Bros question and getting called a commie and being flustered in retort. The rest was just falling back on thumping his normal message, with a few bitter attacks
I don't think Bloomberg recovered even close to what would be necessary to even it out, he got slammed hard overall, absolutely disastrous
But oh my god did Pete look like a fucking weasel. You and I can't be the only ones to come away with a seriously bad impression of him after this. He just looked like a real shit eater the whole time. Passive aggressive, taking cheap shot stabs unprovoked, smarmy retorts.
I don't think it's quite a negative unless people really care about how Bernie Bros are. Unless the 20s white women twitterverse goes voting en masse against Bernie because dudes said mean things on twitter it wont really have any effect on his standing. I agree with you on Bloomberg, I wonder how the DNC feels about getting him in the debates with that sort of performance lmao. I mean, that shit was predictable.
Pete is going to tank at some point when more and more people will google how he conducted himself as mayor of South Bend and how come literally he has turbo negative black support. He's all politician in the worst sense of the word.
Honestly I feel like everyone but Bernie is fine with just splitting the votes as much as possible to have a brokered convention. This is the DNC's and corporate media's aim and it's plain to see. They don't want sanders as the nominee but he's currently in the lead, and this the way to stop him on 1st round is their plan unless he fumbles hard for some odd reason.
Also, Chuck Todd shows us yet again tonight why he's the worst moderator of all the networks. Why does this man have a job?
This post was edited by Helloween7 on Feb 19 2020 10:40pm