d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Censorship Thread
Prev1678910124Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2018 11:16am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 21 2018 11:07am)
When the entire leadership of a company has a strong and identical political agenda, it will bleed into the actions of the entire company, even if safeguards are in place and even if the rank and file of the company have more diverse political views.


Isnt america great where you are free to make a company like that?

#freedom
Member
Posts: 92,992
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 21 2018 11:20am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 21 2018 11:07am)
When the entire leadership of a company has a strong and identical political agenda, it will bleed into the actions of the entire company, even if safeguards are in place and even if the rank and file of the company have more diverse political views.


i agree it's bad, and i disagree with the right's need to redefine things like monopolies to attempt to curb the behavior. they wont recognize what amounts to a monopoly of internet providers, that exploit their customers, but recognize what amounts to a monopoly with search engines because they may or may not be influencing public opinion in a way we can't track or measure, only vaguely see is happening on some level. it's not as if we're even talking monopolies in different sectors, its all internet related.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2018 11:29am
Member
Posts: 50,897
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 21 2018 11:32am
Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 21 2018 11:20am)
i agree it's bad, and i disagree with the right's need to redefine things like monopolies to attempt to curb the behavior. they wont recognize what amounts to a monopoly of internet providers, that exploit their customers, but recognize what amounts to a monopoly with search engines because they may or may not be influencing public opinion in a way we can't track or measure, only vaguely see is happening on some level. it's not as if we're even talking monopolies in different sectors, its all internet related.


I think there's an important distinction that while both ISPs and internet titans like google have monopolies within their respective spheres, ISPs have actually been remarkably non-exploitative in terms of expression, social/political, etc (they've engaged in price gouging for sure, mobile in the US and hard lines in the UK for example), the search titans on the other hand have been rabid and foaming at the bit to exploit their monopolies to affect social/political change and censor peoples opinions. Look at how the battle went for piracy in ISPs vs the DMCA, and compare it to how the battle has gone for free expression on social media. There was a brief time when ISPs sent out scare letters to grudgingly comply with the RIAA, but they dropped even that and are nearly 100% hands-off at this point. Meanwhile google, facebook, twitter, etc are engaging in rampant censorship, manipulation and micromanagement of social trends on a daily basis, which is why I made this thread.

Monopolies in and of themselves aren't inherently corrupt and nefarious. Even in the days of trust-busting, there was an explicit nuance that only the exploitative and abusive monopolies were being targeted;



And there have been at least passable success stories in the 'good trust' departments. Telecoms were only allowed to operate their monopolies when they agreed to measures like extending service to everywhere in America. At least while they stuck to phone lines, it worked out fine, and there were good infrastructure arguments for consolidating under monopoly entities. Once they started charging exorbitant rates for text messages and mobile data it got kind of dubious, but you can do virtually anything you want online short of felonies and your telecoms won't intervene.
Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Sep 21 2018 11:33am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Sep 21 2018 12:29pm)


No Bias here......

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 50,897
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 21 2018 11:33am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Sep 21 2018 11:29am)


hol on
is that an actual message that they sent him? "Potential to impact an election"
jesus christ
Member
Posts: 92,992
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 21 2018 11:34am
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 21 2018 11:33am)
hol on
is that an actual message that they sent him? "Potential to impact an election"
jesus christ


im sure it was just dm'd to him by one of his followers. Woods wouldn't be so hypothetical if it was a real message from twitter. and he also wouldnt delete it without a fuss, which would mean he couldnt post about it pre-fuss, as his acc would be locked.
Member
Posts: 50,897
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 21 2018 11:37am
I had to look it up, he got his account locked for tweeting the 4chan joke meme;



Its important to note that even if you took that 100% serious instead of recognizing it as the obvious troll that he was pointing out it was, that it would still be a legitimate political expression.
Are people not allowed to advocate for staying home and not voting?
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 21 2018 11:45am
nvm u already posted it

This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Sep 21 2018 11:46am
Member
Posts: 92,992
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Sep 21 2018 11:47am
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 21 2018 11:37am)
I had to look it up, he got his account locked for tweeting the 4chan joke meme;

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DnoeBP_U8AE_5E7.jpg

Its important to note that even if you took that 100% serious instead of recognizing it as the obvious troll that he was pointing out it was, that it would still be a legitimate political expression.
Are people not allowed to advocate for staying home and not voting?


#LetWomenDecide where to go for dinner. just make sure you're parked with plenty of phone battery because it's gonna be a bit. dont get fooled when they make a choice in the first minute, that's just phase one. the second guess wont be good either, that always makes them gassy. so u better go to their third choice, but they did have a hard day, whats a little indigestion anyways? why didn't i just go with my first instinct again, do they still have that thing that hasn't been off the menu for 10 years since it was added and logically wouldn't be? i bet they dont, so we cant go there, not even to check, that's a waste of time and gas, unlike sitting in a parking lot with the car on because you thought it might only take a minute or two. 15% battery left, please plug into power, fuck.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1678910124Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll