Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 12 2018 05:07pm)
i think it would have been possible for Hitler to at least pull out a stalemate armistice without his foolish campaign into Russia. And without the US involved Russia may have chosen to throw in with Germany rather than fight them openly. You simply can't change one thing as big as the US being involved and expect pretty much anything to play out the same. It's like a time travel sci fi movie, change one thing and every thing changes when u get back to the future.
Not sure what you mean about France in WW2 tho, Hitler cracked that wall like an egg shell and waltzed into Paris. I'm not so sure the Russians would have come to your defense for years after we did, and the Brits sure wouldn't have invaded without the US.
My grand-parents moved from Belgium to south of France in 1940, they came back 8 months later.
Not all the France was occupied by nazis but only a small part of it. Alsace, north, etc.
U.SS debarquement is 6 June, 1944... So yeah, we didnt waited americans to take back the country.
As another exemple,
"The liberation of Corsica is the fruit of a campaign launched by the French Army, at the initiative of General Henri Giraud, then co-president of the CFLN, against the unfavorable opinion of General de Gaulle who wanted to wait for aid from the Allies."
I dare you to go in Corsica and tell them that they dont speak german because of the u.s. you might not come back home

History is written by winners and that is another perfect exemple of the propaganda americans receive since school. ofc its just natural and intuitiv, they aint gonna say something else.
This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 12 2018 10:29am