Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 27 2018 04:18pm)
I was out earlier and only had time to write 'topic'
but I want to bask in the feeling of sweet vindication as I remind y'all what I was harping on about, at great length and many walls of text, a year and a half ago.
When Trump won and nominated Gorsuch, I was shrieking to anyone who would listen that the democrats were experiencing a self-destructive tea-party-esque radicalism that would cost them politically down the line in substantial ways. They insisted on pointlessly filibustering gorsuch to show how much they opposed him and make sure that the #NotMyPresident crowd didn't come for them like it has just done for a certain new york representative yesterday. The democrats were fearful of their radicalized far-left that was so vehemently anti-Trump that they were willing to force a nuclear showdown on the filibuster. They could have simply let it pass and keep the filibuster option intact, but no, they filibustered and McConnell immediately went nuclear and ended SCOTUS filibusters for good.
And as I predicted, the conditions in the senate changed substantially from when Trump took office. At the time the senators rallied around him with a spike in approval ratings and an election mandate. Even McCain who had a fit with the Gang of 14 was willing to go nuclear when it counted. But now the senate has narrowed to 51-49 and McCain is on his deathbed and openly rebuking Trump if not fully defecting to the democrats yet, and Jeff Flake is probably the least loved man in America. Maybe Murkowski got bought off with considerations for her state, but all it would take is two senators who were normally willing to vote for judicial nominees, but not willing to go nuclear for Trump now- but already went nuclear for him a year and a half ago.
The democrats threw away an important political fight. If we had a nuclear showdown today and either McCain croaks or lives long enough to spite Trump and even one defector is opposed to going nuclear, that would have positioned the democrats in a place to bargain. They would have been able to hold up the replacement and only resolve the showdown with at least some form of compromise even if it was mostly one-sided. They could have extracted a more moderate candidate or some other concessions somewhere. No. Instead, they postured with a pointless filibuster that served only to appease their radicals and now even a heavily dysfunctional senate majority led by McConnell is free to nominate count dracula to the supreme court.
Quote (Skinned @ Jun 27 2018 04:59pm)
He was appointed by President Reagan in 1988. That is thirty years on the Supreme Court of the United States. He was a federal judge from 1975 to 1988, nominated by President Ford.
I hope he gets to enjoy many more years of not having to weigh in and be the most pragmatic and non-dogmatic thinker on the bench, which he has been for quite some time now.
The political ramifications are very high of course, but this good man shouldn't have to worry about all that. Thirty years of public service that came after an already successful career.....
...definitely a good example of what an American Citizen can aspire to be.
Hope he gets to spend time doing what he loves and enjoying his family.
Excellent posts, my friends.
Although I thought skinned was coming in for the kill when I saw the length of the posts tbh