Quote (thesnipa @ May 17 2017 11:19am)
depends on your definition and what the "threat" is aimed at specifically.
A threat to human lives? meh, might cause a few scuffles at rallies and or anecdotal "I killed my neighbor for that damn Trump sign" duffington post news stories.
A threat to the status quo? heavily, it seems to be evolving politics at a rapidly accelerated rate. Specifically, parties seem to be doublethinking and swapping stances at a rate i've never seen. Leakers, the FBI, wars, classified materials, etc. Its like a damn game of ping pong.
A threat to our system's ability to correct itself? less so but still a threat. The erosion of checks/balances and changing of procedural issues to push through legislation is a seriously harmful thing. This could all be leading to a typifying event which unifies us or sunders us permanently.
Well when we define what the threats to america are, you can extrapolate all kinds of things on multiple levels.
Take for example obesity, guns, botulism. As we make advances in health and peace, the life expectancy keeps going up, but our economy is burdened by the age gap. Everyone and their mother sees china's catastrophe on the horizon, but what happens if the US collapses dramatically under the weight of *its* unsustainable economy? Its not really that outrageous to suggest that socio-economic factors could lead to a calamity event ranging from great depression to societal collapse or apocalyptic nuclear war. And the cynical outlook is that we'd have been better off in such scenarios
not having eliminated the causes of mortality.
That is of course, all doomsdayspeak. But its one possible
threat based on the negative effects of eliminating other threats.
For every action I'm sure there would be an upside and downside. The hyperpartisanship is most likely to simply fizzle out like the occupy wallstreet movement. A year from now we might look back and say 'Yeah that was one shit year, that was surprisingly long lived but it died just the same', and we'll point to some high water mark. Or it might spiral out of control and keep getting uglier and uglier. Thats the potential of the
threat. It might break down the establishment's status quo and rapidly evolve politics and wipe away the corrupt bureaucracy, but it might plunge us into chaos.