Quote (cambovenzi @ 25 Jan 2017 21:34)
yes yes blah blah, you are a child. i get it
lets move on.
you pretend you want to but really you can't move on, can you? just like you can't admit your mistakes and your flawed reasoning and logic. you just need to have the last word so you can tell yourself you "won" the argument, right? guess what, no one is interested in our petty little fight, no one is reading all this so you can stop playing for whatever audience you're imagining. you aren't even interested in the issue, your only concern is coming across as superior.
that's why you won't comment on the lack of transparency and the donations although i repeatedly asked you about it. no, you rather ignore these inconvenient questions altogether.
like i said, you can call me a child, a liar, or stupid all you want. in return i will call you what i see: a dishonest and holier-than-thou trump shill, who tries so hard to come across as intelligent, but just can't hide his rage and arrogance when called out for his bs.
awaiting your angry response, boastfully deluding yourself into believing you totally "dismantled" me and "left me for dead intellectually" and other hilarious shit like that (actually looking forward to it somewhat, that stuff was comedy gold), calling me more names while dodging the topic, followed by advice to "move on"...
Quote (GuyLadouche @ 25 Jan 2017 21:41)
can u not realize tho, that thru the fact you and I both know that he held stocks in certain companies, that there is transparency in that? Average people like you and I can clearly see where conflicts of interest may arise, the media also knows this.
As before in past administrations, I would say some may have suspected conflicts, and there is evidence certainly to show this, but the vast majority didn't really know where. I think vast majorities had no idea what was going on with conflicts, and they were MUCH more covered up. With President Trump, there has been speculation since before day 1, as to where conflicts could arise, and thru this, there is transparency.
Even if he doesn't release certain documents to public, which is not out of the possibility mind you, there is still transparency. You just need to look past the fact that he has not released documents yet.
I'm not saying there is ZERO possible chance of conflicts, but he is much more transparent than anyone in office in recent decades. This is my opinion
sry, mate... i can tell you have a pure heart and probably genuinely believe in trump and want to give him a fair chance, but what you just said doesn't even begin to make any sense... the whole drama here is about the fact that NO ONE in the puplic KNOWS if he still holds stock while he signs executive orders that clearly benefit the company of which we KNOW he at the very least HELD stock in. so even if you mistake knowing about that for transparency, this "transparency" has no value when it does not PREVENT such decisions, which would be the whole point of ACTUAL transparency!
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.