d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Gender Isn't Something You Drink
Prev167891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
May 8 2013 07:11pm
Quote (killgoreisleet @ May 9 2013 11:10am)
Well now that you've all just given up even trying to make an argument I'll toss this one into my swelling victory pile.

Thanks for playing.


:thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 8 2013 07:20pm
Quote (duffman316 @ May 8 2013 07:47pm)
are left handed people also freaks?


According to Muslims, quite possibly yes.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 8 2013 07:30pm
boring
Member
Posts: 20,217
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 431.00
May 8 2013 07:34pm
I will never understand social constructivists (or whatever you call these feminists in sheep's wool) being completely dumb shits, trying to paint women into action grrrl roles in movies, pretending to be happy when a man is in touch with his "feminine" side, all that bollocks. It makes no sense to me. Why is it that every woman's role in a movie that's considered a "strong, empowered woman" gained nothing from a woman actually being in the role, and could in fact have been played more convincingly by a man?

While it also makes no sense for gender to even be a topic discussed today, those pussified manginas you see all over the internet, arguing that gender is a social construct and it exists on a spectrum, posting articles from Jezebel about fat acceptance and "slut shaming" all over facebook - nearly gives credence to the idea that maybe they're just women with neck beards.

This post was edited by general_patton on May 8 2013 07:35pm
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
May 8 2013 07:36pm
Quote (general_patton @ May 8 2013 08:34pm)
I will never understand social constructivists (or whatever you call these feminists in sheep's wool) being completely dumb shits, trying to paint women into action grrrl roles in movies, pretending to be happy when a man is in touch with his "feminine" side, all that bollocks. It makes no sense to me.

While it also makes no sense for gender to even be a topic discussed today, those pussified manginas you see all over the internet, arguing that gender is a social construct and it exists on a spectrum, posting articles from Jezebel about fat acceptance and "slut shaming" all over facebook - nearly gives credence to the idea that maybe they're just women with neck beards.


This is pretty much irrefutable.
Member
Posts: 25,367
Joined: Apr 30 2010
Gold: 566.22
May 8 2013 07:37pm
Quote (general_patton @ May 9 2013 11:34am)
I will never understand social constructivists (or whatever you call these feminists in sheep's wool) being completely dumb shits, trying to paint women into action grrrl roles in movies, pretending to be happy when a man is in touch with his "feminine" side, all that bollocks. It makes no sense to me. Why is it that every woman's role in a movie that's considered a "strong, empowered woman" gained nothing from a woman actually being in the role, and could in fact have been played more convincingly by a man?

While it also makes no sense for gender to even be a topic discussed today, those pussified manginas you see all over the internet, arguing that gender is a social construct and it exists on a spectrum, posting articles from Jezebel about fat acceptance and "slut shaming" all over facebook - nearly gives credence to the idea that maybe they're just women with neck beards.


Vouch.
Member
Posts: 62,215
Joined: Jun 3 2007
Gold: 9,039.20
May 8 2013 07:38pm
Quote (general_patton @ May 8 2013 07:34pm)
I will never understand social constructivists (or whatever you call these feminists in sheep's wool) being completely dumb shits, trying to paint women into action grrrl roles in movies, pretending to be happy when a man is in touch with his "feminine" side, all that bollocks. It makes no sense to me.

While it also makes no sense for gender to even be a topic discussed today, those pussified manginas you see all over the internet, arguing that gender is a social construct and it exists on a spectrum, posting articles from Jezebel about fat acceptance and "slut shaming" all over facebook - nearly gives credence to the idea that maybe they're just women with neck beards.


They are clowns, I intend to treat them that way.

:rofl: :hail: :baby:
Member
Posts: 20,217
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 431.00
May 8 2013 07:43pm
Quote (killgoreisleet @ 8 May 2013 20:38)
They are clowns, I intend to treat them that way.

:rofl:  :hail:  :baby:


Absolutely. They have handed in their man cards and will be treated no different than punks in prison or women.
It's pretty easy to see (these days) that women are just children with legal agency so it's a good way to differentiate people.
Member
Posts: 62,215
Joined: Jun 3 2007
Gold: 9,039.20
May 8 2013 07:46pm
Quote (shay11 @ May 8 2013 07:36pm)
This is pretty much irrefutable.


Depends on your paradigm of gender, the concept you adhere to doesn't account for biology, evolution or even basic science.

Unfalsifiable you say? Well, that only makes sense because the conception you use is not a science.

Let's consider nature too, is that unreasonable?

Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 8 2013 07:52pm
No, he's a freak because I really really think so.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev167891011Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll