d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Would You Vote For America To Go To War With Iran? > If They Were Building Nuclear Weapons.
Prev167891015Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 14 2012 03:59am
Quote
Infantryman


:rofl:
Yes that qualifies you to made hasty arrogant judgement without a proper understanding of even what is being said.
Infantryman are the most brainwashed part of the army no wonder you are so confident.
Member
Posts: 17,995
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Mar 14 2012 04:06am
First yoi
Quote (ZingerSupreme @ 14 Mar 2012 11:30)
They claim they can fire missiles in the same manner. Maybe they are lying but in the past they have not made exaggerated claims, any reason to think they would now?
Also who said scud specifically.. we are talking about ballistic missiles in general.

No one is saying  missiles will destroy the US military lol of course in convention war its over in few days.
That is not what we are talking about it is controlling the situation to achieve the US goals.
After all what the point of war if you don't achieve your goals?


First if you want to shoot scud you must do it from the huge truck that carries it.
a Truck is a huge target.
no you can't launch rocket on movement at least not these this truck has to be stationary.
the accurecy of these missles are 20 km... so once you launch you don't know where it will land (at least on far distance targets).
Iran is not Hizbollah they have symetric army which will be taken down in a matter of days.

Quote (MyEnemy @ 14 Mar 2012 11:39)
You saw what this guy posted, "creative and determined like iranians"  Thinks some guys with rpgs are going to sink an aircraft carrier then disappear underground like a diglett.

He's either trolling or he's completely delusion, it's pointless to argue with him.  He probably thinks Allah will come down and sink some ships. He'd probably suicide bomb some women for learning how to read instead if he did though.


Some guy with RPG can't sink an aircraft carrier but sub marine can.
but that is the worst case scenrio.
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Mar 14 2012 04:13am
...we don't actually vote on military intervention but I would support taking out Irans nuclear facilities .
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 14 2012 04:14am
Quote (Many_Names @ Mar 14 2012 12:06pm)
First yoi

First if you want to shoot scud you must do it from the huge truck that carries it.
a Truck is a huge target.
no you can't launch rocket on movement at least not these this truck has to be stationary.
the accurecy of these missles are 20 km... so once you launch you don't know where it will land (at least on far distance targets).
Iran is not Hizbollah they have symetric army which will be taken down in a matter of days.


Tell me, since I don't know that much on the subject, can you prepare it underground, the launch it over ground, then hide it underground again?
I think there is a window of few minutes after launch before incoming strike.

This post was edited by ZingerSupreme on Mar 14 2012 04:16am
Member
Posts: 50,706
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Mar 14 2012 04:19am
Hot shit, this entire thread is like taking a time machine back to before the Iraq invasion.
Did you fuckers not learn your lesson after Korea? After 'Nam? After Afghanistan? After Iraq?
No, no, no, and no- Iran would not "fall in a matters of days", let you plant a flag and bow down and let you plunder it.
Unless our goal is to exterminate every single living creature in all the country with a nuclear holocaust, we're going to lose so many of our boys that we get driven out, shamefully with our tails between our legs.

Want failed war #5?

Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Mar 14 2012 04:13am)
...we don't actually vote on military intervention but I would support taking out Irans nuclear facilities .


It ain't "military intervention" to take out those facilities. It would take full blown war and nothing less.
We're talking about trying to take out a lab thats hidden a mile under a mountain.

You have two choices- either a fullscale war against the entire country with a ground force to try to fight through tunnels and mineshafts, or nuclear bombardment.
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Mar 14 2012 04:23am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 14 2012 05:19am)




It ain't "military intervention" to take out those facilities. It would take full blown war and nothing less.
We're talking about trying to take out a lab thats hidden a mile under a mountain.

You have two choices- either a fullscale war against the entire country with a ground force to try to fight through tunnels and mineshafts, or nuclear bombardment.


...we not only have bunker busters but bunker boring munitions . Follow that up with some massive thermobaric strikes . Problem solved !

Member
Posts: 34,166
Joined: Nov 21 2007
Gold: 0.00
Mar 14 2012 04:25am
USA would take Iran just as quick as they took Iraq.. The thing is no one would put up with this bullshit "the other world powers" so the USA would be seeing missles blow up on their land... "Know as WW3"
Member
Posts: 50,706
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Mar 14 2012 04:30am
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Mar 14 2012 04:23am)
...we not only have bunker busters but bunker boring munitions . Follow that up with some massive thermobaric strikes . Problem solved !


Good against bunkers, not against mountains. Those facilities are half nuke proof, conventional explosives and earthquake bombs wouldn't even give them a headache.




Anyway, so I can pour a cold splash of reality onto the warmongering and bloodlust in this thread, let me ask you this-
what happens if we go into Iran, start carpet bombing military installations and infrastructure, destroying the entire country
and then 3 days later, a nuclear explosive detonates over the skies of Tel Aviv, disintegrating everyone on the ground, killing 2 million israelis.
Because suddenly you find out that Iran had been misleading the world, and had already gotten the bomb- and was just stockpiling before it would reveal it.
And what then?
Because heres the fact of the matter- as soon as we actually attack Iran, they will immediately announce to the world that they have the bomb.
Be it ahmedickface on the air, or the ayatollah himself, someone will speak out and proclaim that they really did have a nuclear weapon program, and it is now online, and if you don't back off, Israel is toast.
And thats exactly what will happen. Whether or not they actually have the bomb. For obvious reasons really. And then, does it matter whether they have the bomb?


How will we respond to that. Iran declares it has the bomb right as we start attacks, and demands we cease, or they obliterate us.
Will we cease, or try to call the bluff and keep bombing? If we do, might chinese or russian or DPRK bomb find its way into Israel? Teach a lesson about MAD.
So pray tell, when Iran makes that announcement on the eve of battle, what will be our reaction?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Mar 14 2012 04:30am
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Mar 14 2012 04:38am
Quote (Goomshill @ Mar 14 2012 05:30am)
Good against bunkers, not against mountains. Those facilities are half nuke proof, conventional explosives and earthquake bombs wouldn't even give them a headache.



...we have already identified every single entrance into or exit from the facilities . Collapse those and that enrichment facility becomes a mountain tomb .
Member
Posts: 1,230
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 14 2012 04:44am
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Mar 14 2012 12:38pm)
...we have already identified every single entrance into or exit from the facilities . Collapse those and that enrichment facility becomes a mountain tomb .


And this will delay the nuclear program by as long as it takes to reopen them.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev167891015Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll