d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Wtf Is It With People And Their Dogs?
Prev167891022Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,699
Joined: Jun 28 2010
Gold: 20.00
Apr 3 2011 03:25pm
pitbulls are scary

they look like they evaded some of the evolutionary requisites for a domestic animal of this century
Member
Posts: 12,397
Joined: Jul 2 2005
Gold: 256.00
Apr 3 2011 03:56pm
Quote (ii88 @ Apr 3 2011 04:41pm)
I think you and Torm1 are both grossly downplaying the danger of a pitbull being unleashed and aggressive so close to a young child.


This. Anyone who has raised a child would understand.
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Apr 3 2011 03:57pm
Quote (vvangough4 @ Apr 3 2011 05:25pm)
pitbulls are scary

they look like they evaded some of the evolutionary requisites for a domestic animal of this century


Nah, pitbulls are cute.

This is scary.

Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
Apr 3 2011 04:26pm
Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ Apr 3 2011 01:57pm)
Nah, pitbulls are cute.

This is scary.

http://happycarpenter.blogs.com/the_happy_carpenter/images/ugly_dog_winner_chinese_meat_crested_1.jpg


I know, hideous woman.
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Apr 3 2011 04:39pm
Quote (ii88 @ Apr 3 2011 04:18pm)
I assume this is directed toward me. I actually thought we were having an intelligent debate, but now I realize you don't even care about the dog, or the child, but rather you just want to attack my character.


yes we got off topic just cause you felt like acting hard on the internet. instead of adding any relevant response you decided to tell people you are so badass you would of beat the dog and the owner with a bat.
Member
Posts: 4,886
Joined: Apr 24 2010
Gold: 5.00
Apr 3 2011 04:39pm
Quote (PlasmaSnake101 @ Apr 3 2011 05:26pm)
I know, hideous woman.


:rofl:

The doggie may not be the cutest in the world, but it still seems like an incredibly patient and/or friendly dog if it's letting itself be held in that incredibly awkward-looking position. :lol:

This post was edited by catkaboodle on Apr 3 2011 04:39pm
Member
Posts: 12,380
Joined: Jun 8 2006
Gold: 2,482.00
Apr 3 2011 04:56pm
Quote (Psycho- @ Apr 3 2011 06:39pm)
yes we got off topic just cause you felt like acting hard on the internet. instead of adding any relevant response you decided to tell people you are so badass you would of beat the dog and the owner with a bat.


I sense anger and frustration. Perhaps problems at home? I injured your alpha male mentality by saying I would attack the dog and its owner. The issue you have with me isn't even whether I have the right to attack them, but that you think that I think I'm a "badass". A rather juvenile argument. Please don't lecture me on relevancy when you yourself are completely foreign to the concept. Only person acting "hard" here is you. Why are you so obsessed with my original comment that you can't seem to let it go, unless it bruised your precious pride somehow?
Member
Posts: 32,985
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Apr 3 2011 05:37pm
Quote (ii88 @ Apr 3 2011 05:56pm)
I sense anger and frustration. Perhaps problems at home? I injured your alpha male mentality by saying I would attack the dog and its owner. The issue you have with me isn't even whether I have the right to attack them, but that you think that I think I'm a "badass". A rather juvenile argument. Please don't lecture me on relevancy when you yourself are completely foreign to the concept. Only person acting "hard" here is you. Why are you so obsessed with my original comment that you can't seem to let it go, unless it bruised your precious pride somehow?


the issue is you lying on the internet so blatantly and your inability to admit you wouldn't actually do it. it wasn't even an issue until you decided to further your statement and assure everyone that you would actually do it.

now continue to rant and run away from the fact you desperately overcompensated over the internet and got caught.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Apr 3 2011 07:38pm
Quote (TacoBell @ 3 Apr 2011 21:00)
This post reeks of ignorance.

Pitbulls are feared more because they are a powerful breed not necessarily because they are aggressive.
Think about it, when a pitbull bites someone it is a big deal. When a small dog bites someone nobody cares.
Attacks by small dogs are far outnumber attacks by pitbulls, yet they receive no attention in the media. They have less devastating results and far less people will go out of their way to report an incident with a small dog.

The quality of owners of all types of dogs is quite low from my experience. I own a pitbull and my dog has been attacked multiple times. Not once has it fought back. My dog has been trained to be non-aggressive and it trusts that I will handle any situation as long as I am there.

The conditioning a dog receives in one's care is more important than the breed itself. A person who claims knowledge on this subject should know this.

I would say legislation for pitbulls is not because of the breed.
It is to curb the behavior of the owners who have no business owning something they cannot control.


seems you are looking into a mirror

while the owner plays a role there are inherited breed characteristics
and that you have a docile pitbull does not change that that is more of an exception
why are pitbulls banned in many countries but staffordshire terriers not?
and why are argentinian dogos banned in more countries than great danes?
there are plenty breeds with similar builds but different characteristics
dogs have been selected for their characteristics for millennia and a dog generation is only ~3 years
and with the advent of "pure breed" standards in the 18th century there has been an even higher emphasise on those

there are plenty dog breeds which are more powerful than pitbulls which are banned nowhere

that being said, i do agree with your the second bolded
and that is scary when it comes to dangerous or other "volatile" breeds
so far never met an irresponsible owner of siberian huskies
but plenty other "strong dog" owners where the owner feels strong because he has a strong dog
everyone who does not inform him- (or her-) self about breed characteristics when obtaining a dog is silly
and anyone who considers a pitbull as just as much as a family suited dog as a golden retriever
reminds me of someone running a dairy farm with angus cattle
Member
Posts: 47,610
Joined: Jul 17 2008
Gold: 25.00
Apr 3 2011 08:05pm
It sucks that you had a shitty experience with a dog, they are amazing.

OP doesn't address the idea that the dog is the owner's "child" or at least he sees it in that sense. You brandished a bat at his de facto child... you'd be swearing too, regardless of it's seemingly hostile behavior.



Quote (ii88 @ Apr 3 2011 02:56pm)
I sense anger and frustration. Perhaps problems at home? I injured your alpha male mentality by saying I would attack the dog and its owner. The issue you have with me isn't even whether I have the right to attack them, but that you think that I think I'm a "badass". A rather juvenile argument. Please don't lecture me on relevancy when you yourself are completely foreign to the concept. Only person acting "hard" here is you. Why are you so obsessed with my original comment that you can't seem to let it go, unless it bruised your precious pride somehow?


I'd have you on the ground with both arms broken long before you ever touched my dog bro. In general, the kind of people that take their dogs out to parks on leashes are as protective of their dogs as they would be children.

This post was edited by GTL on Apr 3 2011 08:15pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev167891022Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll