Quote (RedFromWinter @ Dec 16 2024 09:14pm)
Am I misunderstanding, or are you contradicting your own definition argument about scale and rising to minimum thresholds for these definitions to have weight?
By definition, Jan 6 was an insurrection. Same as by definition, Luigi is a terrorist. Both don't really rise to the levels the populace is expecting though. Perhaps Luigi has unrealized plans that were thwarted, but as it stands he killed one CEO. On par with the crimes of a mentally ill person. No mass bombings, no mass murder, no ploy to massively disrupt health care. Sure, he is a terrorist, but that really waters down the word. Guess I'm used to more grandiose incidents when terrorist pulled out the dictionary
Its about intent not scale. Terrorism is defined by the actors and their motive. If the US drops firebombs on Tokyo, its an act of war. If Al Qaeda bombs a subway its terrorism. If a gas pipe exploded in a suburban house its an accident.
Theres a pretty high number of failed terrorists or underachievers who kill one person or just get themselves blown up or imprisoned. Non state actors engaged in political/religious violence to push their agenda, its terrorism. I guess to scale it only matters to specify deadly or serious violence, nobody cares about some rand paul wacko starting fistfights in a bar
But yes it boils down to that whole vain exercise in debating over definitions when words are supposed to convey mutually understood meanings. Few words got tortured and twisted more since 911 than "terrorism"