Literally shaking my head here. You should start replying to what people actually say when you quote them if your goal is to have a civil debate.

All I did was correctly pointing out that you dodged when you quoted zorzin and the result is you crying your eyes out, accusing me of flaming and telling me I'm shitposting (so who is flaming who, lol)

And posting Putin gif or whatever does not bother me at all and just shows your real intend here (not having a civil debate)

Crushed you right there, bow out already lol

This post was edited by Djunior on Jun 21 2024 01:23pm

If the US military loses 2 proxy wars simultaneously but wins a war on gendered bathrooms, is that still 1 for 3?

I'll believe in a proper "BRICS confederacy" when I see it. Like I've said before: India, Brazil etc. prioritizing their own country and refusing to go along with Western sanctions is very different from them actively allying with China/Russia against the West in a military conflict or a trade war.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jun 21 2024 01:52pm

So, maybe someone can clarify this for me.

If NK and RU agree to aide each other, Does this mean NK is at war with Ukraine && RU could potentially go to war with South Korea, should that flare back up?

This post was edited by Mondain on Jun 21 2024 02:05pm

It’s really not that deep. The defensive pacts are more so to provide each other with resources and cooperation evading sanctions. Neither would really go to war for each other.

Their defensive pacts are purposefully worded ambiguously but designed to echo the terms of Article 5 of NATO, as such they wouldn't apply to aggressive wars, only to mutual defense in the case of invasion. This is also basically the same case the USSR had with the DPRK up until 1990. The soviets aided in the Korean war when it was a direct conflict, but neither country involved themselves in the others low level or proxy conflicts, there were no north koreans joining the soviet's afghanistan war which would be like wondering about the ukraine war now.

Russia to vastly helping the worst regime on the planet which is constantly doing nuclear threats to its neighboor including SK.
Ruscists can pretend about some nice "economical echange" but no one buy this shit: it is a military agreement aka "defence": (Food not sure, or maybe Caviar for this fat ugly monster) & Military Technology vs Weapons & Workforce

This is fully justifying SK to -vastly- help Ukraine to defeat Russia asap [Expecting the Russian regime to change and to stop this "project"]... Once again the full blame is on Russia which started all this.

Direct war ? Nope.
Silently delivering to Ukraine like NK did with Russia ? Yes.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Jun 21 2024 07:04pm

It does seem like Andreis being replaced with illegal Joses now up here. Who cares though, so long as Jose can cook eggs at the understaffed northern breakfast place fatties of Edina love.

I did see 14 south American pop out of a sprinter at Menards yesterday... Illegal Drywall crew

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Jun 22 2024 06:46am

The way I read it, NK could theoretically "lend" some "volunteer" troops to Russia for their war in Ukraine. Highly unlikely though, since NK doesn't want to risk bad news about fallen soldiers at home, nor defections of those soldiers to the West.
Russia could in theory send troops to North Korea's defense, but that's a moot point - if a full-blown war breaks out on the Korean peninsula, the key player is China, not Russia.

Russia just wants some of the cheap cold war era artillery and 7.62 ammo being pumped out by NK slave factories.