Quote (ofthevoid @ Jan 23 2024 10:57am)
I have no idea by what percent the wall would reduce illegal migration, but the cost of doing nothing is also significant. I'd argue it's actually a lot more significant than the cost of actually getting the border under control.
You can't have millions of people a year come into this country illegally, with many ending up on various social safety net programs on a indefinite basis. It's a huge collective cost to the taxpayer that manifests in a lot of different ways that can't be easily tracked.
I'd note though, this has not been an argument about cost, but has always been framed in politics based on feelings, caring, etc. Like this is at least a 10 year old problem. It's a necessary investment and government can no longer pretend it's not a pressing issue.
just take the guards off the borders and have them do random check ins with roofing, construction, produce picking, and other commonly exploitative jobs. fine companies HEAVILY when they get caught using workers without a green card.
if the river is giving you problems just break the levy wall on the retention pond downstream.
immigration itself isn't the real root cause, demands for dirt cheap labor is.
then crack down on social safety nets.
its still not my prefered solution, i'd make the southern border a scattered line of army bases and have people do time there after active deployments to cool off. sign people on as ice agents if they like the work. that cuts down on vet suicide, unemployment and homelessness too.