d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Pard Halloween Costumes
Prev1678910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2023 11:10am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 07:56pm)
you're strawmanning, i was against cuties because of the poor execution you're describing as "viral theatrically released softcore child-****". we agree, that's why i didnt like it. all i said additionally was that i got what they were going for, i just didnt like where it went to try and prove that. there were far better ways to prove that point, i agree with the point, not the execution.

so for being anti-pedo u called me a pedo haha.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 07:29pm)
for a history lesson i said netflix's "cuties" was a dumb movie and poorly executed, i just pointed out the stated message by its creators was that pageants and dance mom culture were fuel for pedos, it was an anti pedo movie. u then freaked out and called me a pedo lol.


you're backtracking haha.

By your admission, the creators "poorly executed" their movie and "accidentally" produced softcore child-**** (material in the movie exactly fits the definition of the term)

You STILL called this "accidentally" produced softcore child-**** - an "anti pedo movie".

I'm not putting words in your mouth. Your quotes are shown above.

How to call someone who subscribes to the idea that "accidentally" produced softcore child-**** - is an "anti pedo movie"?

It's left for others to decide for themselves now.
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Oct 13 2023 11:14am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 10:09am)
if the creators of the movie just did it more tastefully with FAR MORE camera shots of disgusted people and far fewer and better shot angles of kids doing inappropriate dancing it would have got it's message across. as it was it read more like a parody that no one is supposed to realize it's parody. not the way to drive home a point.


While I haven't watched the film (and will not), I don't buy the notion that it was a parody. I think it's more likely that such elements were placed into the film for plausible deniability. The shots of kids "dancing" proves this nearly unequivocally in my opinion. That and it's a film from France, and we all know about the French and paedophilia
Member
Posts: 92,944
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 13 2023 11:29am
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 13 2023 12:10pm)
you're backtracking haha.

By your admission, the creators "poorly executed" their movie and "accidentally" produced softcore child-**** (material in the movie exactly fits the definition of the term)

You STILL called this "accidentally" produced softcore child-**** - an "anti pedo movie".

I'm not putting words in your mouth. Your quotes are shown above.

How to call someone who subscribes to the idea that "accidentally" produced softcore child-**** - is an "anti pedo movie"?

It's left for others to decide for themselves now.


you are trying not to get what im saying at this point. i never said it wasn't softcore, i agreed. i said that's specifically why i dont like it.

originally u stated it was done for no reason other than to make softcore, i said that's how it turned out but the stated intent was opposite of that.

but u can continue to argue the opposite of what im saying if it makes u feel better.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 13 2023 11:30am
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2023 12:13pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 08:29pm)
originally u stated it was done for no reason other than to make softcore, i said that's how it turned out but the stated intent was opposite of that

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 07:29pm)
it was an anti pedo movie.


You are trying not to get what im saying at this point, while i am citing your actual quotes.

Their supposed "stated intent" failed, and they ended up producing & releasing a softcore child-**** movie.

You labelled a softcore child-**** as an "anti pedo movie".
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Oct 13 2023 12:17pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 10:29am)
you are trying not to get what im saying at this point. i never said it wasn't softcore, i agreed. i said that's specifically why i dont like it.

originally u stated it was done for no reason other than to make softcore, i said that's how it turned out but the stated intent was opposite of that.

but u can continue to argue the opposite of what im saying if it makes u feel better.


You don't actually believe that their "stated intent" is genuine do you?
Member
Posts: 92,944
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 13 2023 12:20pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 13 2023 01:13pm)
You are trying not to get what im saying at this point, while i am citing your actual quotes.


then let me help you:

Quote
Their supposed "stated intent" failed, and they ended up producing & releasing a softcore child-**** movie.


correct, and i agree with you

Quote
You labelled a softcore child-**** as an "anti pedo movie".


no, i said the creators stated it was an anti pedo movie. you were the one who claimed they made it for sick reasons, not me. you made a claim, i said here is their stated intent, u called me a pedo lol.


Quote (El1te @ Oct 13 2023 01:17pm)
You don't actually believe that their "stated intent" is genuine do you?


french people are wierd as shit. idk what they were going for, just what they said they were going for.

but logically why would they bother to create wierd kid porn, when the internet is already flooded with completely analogous other content.

do you think they made the movie to give pedos spank bank material? that seems to be the other alternative in this binary.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 13 2023 12:21pm
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2023 12:26pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 09:20pm)
no, i said the creators stated it was an anti pedo movie. you were the one who claimed they made it for sick reasons, not me. you made a claim, i said here is their stated intent, u called me a pedo lol.


I called you a pedophile *defender*

For providing defence for people that produced & released a softcore child-**** movie, same thing you did both then and are doing now.

Member
Posts: 92,944
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 13 2023 12:29pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 13 2023 01:26pm)
I called you a pedophile *defender*

For providing defence for people that produced & released a softcore child-**** movie, same thing you did both then and are doing now.


everything to a hammer is a nail, i told you then and now it was a poorly done disgrace of a movie. but that u got one part a bit wrong. that's a line u never cross, tacit agreement or you pull out the P-word lol.

this happens to literally anyone who talks to you.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 13 2023 12:40pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 13 2023 09:29pm)
everything to a hammer is a nail, i told you then and now it was a poorly done disgrace of a movie. but that u got one part a bit wrong. that's a line u never cross, tacit agreement or you pull out the P-word lol.

this happens to literally anyone who talks to you.


only if that anyone is gullible enough to believe the "stated intent" was to make the complete opposite of what actually ended up being produced.
Member
Posts: 92,944
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 13 2023 12:42pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ Oct 13 2023 01:40pm)
only if that anyone is gullible enough to believe the "stated intent" was to make the complete opposite of what actually ended up being produced.


the story is how botched of an attempt they made of their stated intent. you weren't happy with that and needed it to be a "pedos are getting ballsy enough to do it openly" story. and any disagreement is defense for pedos to you lol.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1678910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll