Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 24 2020 10:59am)
If we go by deaths per 1m, then Spain, Belgium, Italy and the UK are already worse than Sweden, but those were the epicenters of the pandemic in Europe. Sweden might be able to leave France behind in the end, but the next on the list is the Netherlands with a large gap, so it looks as if Sweden will still end up with one of the worst mortality rates in Europe. All neighboring Scandinavic countries are doing far better by this metric, just like Germany, Poland, Portugal, Greece, Austria, and most of Eastern Europe.
The Swedish strategy might be the best one if pulled off perfectly, but it's a high risk strategy, every mistake you make with it is punished badly - and that's what happened in Sweden when they failed to properly protect the elderly in the beginning. They paid for this mistake with a high and unnecessary death toll.
Also, let's not forget that the Swedish model crucially relies on a disciplined, responsible, solidary populace who eagerly plays along with what its government asks from it. Doesnt really sound like a feasible approach for the U.S. ^_^
Until it mutates around immunity.
herd immunity depends on a flu virus behaving over time like chicken pox, and even chicken pox can come back as terrible shingles. but a flu isn't chicken pox, it's not nearly as stagnant. it will get around immunity, as it already has, and require continual updates to vaccines.
people who lean on herd immunity and vaccines just make me confused....