Is it?

I'm trying to separate the "these tax cuts are paid for" and "this medicare-for-all bill is paid for" claims from the "this blatantly corrupt thing our leader did was not corrupt, actually it was completely justified" claim. Important to distinguish between standard political stuff and batshit crazy justifications.

If people like you didn't believe this, Trump wouldn't be possible.

Rachel Maddow spent years reporting that the American president was a veritable Russian pawn.

We have a poor guy on this forum who goes around calling the Senate Majority Leader "Moscow Mitch", as if one of the highest ranking politicians in our most august political institution is one of Putin's personal stooges. Do you think he came up with that himself? He's a product of Democratic media. It's modern day McCarthyism.

Meanwhile we have serious Democratic candidates advocating for open borders, an affirmative right to abortion, and race reparations. Second place is an avowed socialist who emulates Latin American dictatorships.

It is convenient for us that she is admitting that they are covering up a crime for the sake of politics.

We are going to hammer the GOP on the cover up of the decade.

The Right might just blow another gimme reelection.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 31 2020 08:52pm

Just keep owning us libtards. We get the cover up of the decade to tear apart the Senate and House.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 31 2020 09:04pm

because that's sure polling well

In November?

Shake dat Magic 8 ball.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jan 31 2020 10:37pm

if its hasn't polled well throughout the impeachment, and isn't polling well now, why would it poll well in november?
what is it, Crystal Pepsi?

It's delusional to think that pundits in media won't shill for their party. The 'both sides' argument is real and continues to hold true.