Quote (thesnipa @ Aug 17 2016 09:13am)
3rd and 4th were both moderate candidates who would have had an ok, but still losing, general, Kasich and Rubio. Despite the circus of a primary half of the final 4 were decent candidates. Rubio just panders too much and Kasich has too strong of a war on drugs stance. But both are fixable and both could have a good 2020 run.
The only reason Rubio didn't rise was his robotic tendencies. He could speak great off the cuff but would inexplicably go right into entirely scripted practiced routines. He needs to work on being more approachable, a latino in the GOP could be a real threat.
He will get better as he gets more confident. My favorite thing about Bill Clinton, toward the end, you would see him saying one thing, and see the teleprompter saying something completely different, where he would just go into an in depth tangent about some aspect of policy and describe it with lucid nuance, and the speechwriters were somewhere scratching their heads.
We have been successful under smart presidents. I don't know why the GOP is rejecting them. Voting for Trump over Cruz or Rubio seems insane to me. Its like they think this is the dialog of a wrestling match, and the election is the match, and its just done after that. The guy can't talk intelligently about the job he is running for, and they want four years of temper tantrums, cop outs, and shitting the bed? Good grief.
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 17 2016 09:22am)
I really don't think that is true. Trump has been a tremendously uniting factor for liberals and moderates... if Rubio or particularly Kasich ran, I think they would have the advantage.
There would at least be an election with choices for intelligent people.
This post was edited by Skinned on Aug 17 2016 08:23am